The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Credibility and computing technology
Abstract
The article focuses on the fact that like many aspects of people's lives computers seem to be facing a credibility crisis. For most of the computing's brief history, people have held computers in high regard. A quick review of the popular culture from the past few decades reflects people's general confidence in computing systems. In cinema and literature, computers are often portrayed as infallible sidekicks in the service of humanity. In the consumer realm, computer-based information and services have been marketed as better, more reliable and more credible sources of information than humans. Consider, for example, computerized weather prediction, computerized automotive analysis and so-called computer dating. In these and other areas, the public has generally been led to believe that if a computer said it or produced it, it was believable. Research shows that people who lack expertise seem less willing or able to skeptical about a computing technology designed to help them. Although it may be an overstatement to say that computers are facing a credibility crisis, the credibility of computing products will be a growing concern-within and outside professional circles INSET: Semantic Problems Discussing Credibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MUIR, B. M., & MORAY, N. (1996) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139608964474 · Cited by 993
Cited by
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1067860.1067867 · Cited by 1,333
Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415130402 · Cited by 1,286
Filieri, R. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.006 · Cited by 1,083
The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency
Francisco, K., & Swanson, D. (2018) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics2010002 · Cited by 951
Metadata
- Authors
- Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1999-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 39-44
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2091656550
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.