CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

Supporting the Use of User Generated Content in Journalistic Practice

Tolmie, Peter, Procter, Rob, Randall, David William, Rouncefield, Mark, Burger, Christian, Wong Sak Hoi, Geraldine, Zubiaga, Arkaitz, Liakata, Maria·2017·Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
DOI 10.1145/3025453.3025892
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3025453.3025892

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media has become a powerful tool for journalists and ordinary citizens.

    “Hence, social media has become a powerful tool for journalists (Diakopoulos et al. 2012;Tolmie et al. 2017) but also for ordinary citizens (Hermida 2010).”

    From Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media (2019) · cites this paper as Tolmie et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Katerina Andreadou, Symeon Papadopoulos, Lazaros Apostolidis, Anastasia Krithara, and Yiannis Kompatsiaris. (2015). Media REVEALr: A Social Multimedia Monitoring and Intelligence System for Web Multimedia Verification. In Intelligence and Security Informatics, Proceedings of PAISI 2015, Springer, pp 1-20.
  2. Paul Bernal. 2014. A defence of responsible tweeting. Communications Law, 19 (1), 12.
  3. Pablo J. Boczkowski. 2010. News at Work: Imitation in an age of information abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Kalina Bontcheva, Maria Liakata, Arno Scharl, & Rob Procter. 2015. Workshop on Rumors and Deception in Social Media: Detection, Tracking, and Visualization, WWW2015, Florence, Italy.
  5. Dominic Boyer & Ulf Hannerz. 2006. Introduction Worlds of journalism. Ethnography 7, no. 1 (2006): 5- 17.
  6. Matthew Brehmer, Stephen Ingram, Jonathan Stray and Tamara Munzner. 2014. Overview: The Design, Adoption, and Analysis of a Visual Document Mining Tool for Investigative Journalists. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Volume 20, Issue 12, Dec. 31 2014, 2271-2280.
  7. Marcel Broersma & Todd Graham. 2012. Social media as beat: tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice, 6(3), 403-419.
  8. Andrew Calcutt & Philip Hammond. 2011. Journalism Studies: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
  9. Andy Crabtree, Mark Rouncefield, and Peter Tolmie. 2012. Doing Design Ethnography. Springer.
  10. Mark Deuze. 2003. The web and its journalisms: considering the consequences of different types of newsmedia online. New media & society, 5(2), pp.203- 230.
  11. Nicholas Diakopoulos, Mor Naaman, & Funda Kivran- Swaine. 2010. Diamonds in the Rough: Social media visual analytics for journalistic inquiry. In 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). pp. 115-122. IEEE.
  12. Nicholas Diakopoulos, Munmun De Choudbury, & Mor Naaman. 2012. Finding and Assessing Social Media Information Sources in the Context of Journalism. Proceedings of CHI'12, ACM
  13. Samantha Finn, Panagiotis Takis Metaxas& Eni Mustafaraj. 2014. Investigating rumor propagation with TwitterTrails. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.3550. · arXiv
  14. Stephanie Gleason. 2010. Harnessing social media: News outlets are assigning staffers to focus on networking. American Journalism Review, 32(1), 6-8.
  15. Maximillian T. Hänska-Ahy & Roxanna Shapour. 2013. Who's Reporting the Protests? Converging practices of citizen journalists and two BBC World Service newsrooms, from Iran's election protests to the Arab uprisings. Journalism studies, 14(1), 29-45.
  16. Naeemul Hassan, Afroza Sultana, You Wu, Gensheng Zhang, Chengkai Li, Jun Yang, & Cong Yu. 2014. Data In, Fact Out: Automated Monitoring of Facts by FactWatcher, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Vol. 7, No, 13. VLDB Endowment
  17. Christian Heath, Marcus Sanchez Svensson, Jon Hindmarsh, Paul Luff, & Dirk Vom Lehn. 2002. Configuring awareness. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW),11(3-4), 317-347.
  18. Alfred Hermida. 2010. Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism practice, 4(3), 297-308.
  19. Alfred Hermida. 2012. Journalism as a Discipline of Collective Verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659-668.
  20. International Press Telecommunications Council (IPTC). 2016. Controlled Vocabularies for the Media. https://iptc.org/standards/newscodes/
  21. Satu Jumisko-Pyyko, Heli Vaataja, Markus Jaakola. 2014. Quality Management of User-Generated Content in Participatory Journalism. Proceedings of OzCHI'14. ACM. 488-497.
  22. Finn Kensing, Jesper Simonsen, & Keld Bødker. 1998. Participatory design at a radio station. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3-4), 243- 271.
  23. Alan Knight, Cherian George & Alex Gerlis. 2008. Debate: Who is a Journalist?. Journalism Studies. Vol. 9, No. 1 (2008), 117-131.
  24. Dominic L. Lasorsa, Seth C. Lewis, & Avery E. Holton. 2012. Normalizing Twitter: Journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism studies, 13(1), 19-36.
  25. Nic Newman. 2009. The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream journalism. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, 8(2), 1-5.
  26. Deokgun Park, Simranjit Sachar, Nicholas Diakopoulos and Niklas Elmqvist. 2016. Supporting Comment Moderators in Identifying High Quality Online News Comments. Proceedings of CHI'16, ACM.
  27. Chris A. Paterson. 2008. Making online news: The ethnography of new media production (Vol. 1). Peter Lang.
  28. Steve Paulussen & Raymond A. Harder. 2014. Social media references in newspapers: Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as sources in newspaper journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542-551.
  29. Thomas Poell & Erik Borra. 2012. Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695-713.
  30. Rob Procter, Farida Vis, & Alex Voss. 2013. Reading the riots on Twitter: methodological innovation for the analysis of big data. International journal of social research methodology, 16(3), 197-214.
  31. Paul Resnick, Samuel Carton, Souneil Park, Yuncheng Shen, & Nicole Zeffer. 2014. RumorLens: A system for analyzing the impact of rumors and corrections in social media. In Proceedings of Computational Journalism Conference 2014.
  32. Jane B. Singer. 2014. User-Generated Visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media and Society, 16(1), pp. 55-73.
  33. Jane B. Singer. 2015. Out of Bounds: Professional Norms as Boundary Markers. In: M. Carlson & S.C. Lewis (Eds.), Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. Oxford: Routledge, 21-36.
  34. Wilma Stassen. 2010. Your news in 140 characters: exploring the role of social media in journalism. Global Media Journal: African Edition, 4(1).
  35. Andrea H. Tapia, Nicolas LaLone, & Hyun-Woo Kim. 2014. Run Amok: Group Crowd Participation in Identifying the Bomb and Bomber from the Boston Marathon Bombing. In Proceedings of the 11th Int. ISCRAM Conference.
  36. Tolmie, Peter, Rob Procter, Mark Rouncefield, Maria Liakata, and Arkaitz Zubiaga. 2015. Microblog Analysis as a Programme of Work. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.03193 (2015). · arXiv
  37. Jeannette Wing. 2008. Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences 366, no. 1881 (2008): 3717-3725.
  38. Markos Zampoglou, Symeon Papadopoulos, Yiannis Kompatsiaris, Ruben Bouwmeester & Jochen Spangenberg. 2016. Web and Social Media Image Forensics for News Professionals. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
  39. Barbie Zelizer. 2004. When facts, truth, and reality are God-terms: on journalism's uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 1.1 (2004): 100-119.
  40. Arkaitz Zubiaga, Heng Ji, Kevin Knight. 2013. Curating and Contextualizing Twitter Stories to Assist with Social Newsgathering. Proceedings of IUI'13. ACM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolmie, P., Procter, R., Randall, D. W., Rouncefield, M., Burger, C., Wong Sak Hoi, G., Zubiaga, A., & Liakata, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Nottingham & University of Warwick, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Warwick University, Warwick, United Kingdom
  • University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
  • Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
  • SwissInfo.ch, Bern, Switzerland
  • University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-05-02
Pages
3632-3644
DOI
10.1145/3025453.3025892
Cited by
52
References
2
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
EC 7th Framework Programme (611233)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review