Cited by 163Emotion and Mood RecognitionMental Health via WritingDigital Mental Health Interventions

DeepMood: Forecasting Depressed Mood Based on Self-Reported Histories via Recurrent Neural Networks

Open access
Suhara, Yoshihiko, Xu, Yinzhan, Pentland, Alex 'Sandy'·2017·Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web

Abstract

Depression is a prevailing issue and is an increasing problem in many people's lives. Without observable diagnostic criteria, the signs of depression may go unnoticed, resulting in high demand for detecting depression in advance automatically. This paper tackles the challenging problem of forecasting severely depressed moods based on self-reported histories. Despite the large amount of research on understanding individual moods including depression, anxiety, and stress based on behavioral logs collected by pervasive computing devices such as smartphones, forecasting depressed moods is still an open question. This paper develops a recurrent neural network algorithm that incorporates categorical embedding layers for forecasting depression. We collected large-scale records from 2,382 self-declared depressed people to conduct the experiment. Experimental results show that our method forecast the severely depressed mood of a user based on self-reported histories, with higher accuracy than SVM. The results also showed that the long-term historical information of a user improves the accuracy of forecasting depressed mood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3038912.3052676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Utsureko and EmotionSense, two independent smartphone applications for mood monitoring through self-reports, were used by more than 24 000 and 17 000 users, respectively.

    “On a larger scale, Utsureko [20] and EmotionSense [21], two independent smartphone applications for mood monitoring through self-reports, were used by more than 24 000 and 17 000 users, respectively.”
  • Others focused on detecting depression by tracking medication, sleep patterns and actions, location or keypress acceleration.

    “Others focused on detecting depression by tracking medication, sleep patterns and actions [20], location [11] or keypress acceleration [165].”
  • Some recent works employ recurrent neural networks, feed-forward layers, multi-task learning and autoencoders to fill in missing sensor data, or to learn better representations.

    “Some recent works employ recurrent neural networks [20], feed-forward layers [159], multi-task learning [160] and autoencoders to fill in missing sensor data [161], or to learn better representations [162].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 163

Authors
Suhara, Y., Xu, Y., & Pentland, A. '.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web
Published
2017-04-03
Pages
715-724
OpenAlex
W2605108175
Cited by
163
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 6
FWCI
25.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mood prediction, recurrent neural networks, mental health monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review