The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey on Malware Detection Using Data Mining Techniques
Abstract
In the Internet age, malware (such as viruses, trojans, ransomware, and bots) has posed serious and evolving security threats to Internet users. To protect legitimate users from these threats, anti-malware software products from different companies, including Comodo, Kaspersky, Kingsoft, and Symantec, provide the major defense against malware. Unfortunately, driven by the economic benefits, the number of new malware samples has explosively increased: anti-malware vendors are now confronted with millions of potential malware samples per year. In order to keep on combating the increase in malware samples, there is an urgent need to develop intelligent methods for effective and efficient malware detection from the real and large daily sample collection. In this article, we first provide a brief overview on malware as well as the anti-malware industry, and present the industrial needs on malware detection. We then survey intelligent malware detection methods. In these methods, the process of detection is usually divided into two stages: feature extraction and classification/clustering . The performance of such intelligent malware detection approaches critically depend on the extracted features and the methods for classification/clustering. We provide a comprehensive investigation on both the feature extraction and the classification/clustering techniques. We also discuss the additional issues and the challenges of malware detection using data mining techniques and finally forecast the trends of malware development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
(1992) · Cited by 23,431
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Neural networks for pattern recognition
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,538
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., Coller, H., Loh, M. L., Downing, J. R., Caligiuri, M. A., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531 · Cited by 11,516
Peng, H., Long, F., & Ding, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.159 · Cited by 10,544
Cited by
Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Survey
Chalapathy, R., & Chawla, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.03407 · Cited by 1,240
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
A Survey on Heterogeneous Graph Embedding: Methods, Techniques, Applications and Sources
Wang, X., Bo, D., Shi, C., Fan, S., Ye, Y., & Yu, P. S. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2022.3177455 · Cited by 438
Self-citationDynamic Malware Analysis in the Modern Era—A State of the Art Survey
Or-Meir, O., Nissim, N., Elovici, Y., & Rokach, L. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3329786 · Cited by 384
Application of deep learning to cybersecurity: A survey
Mahdavifar, S., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.056 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Ye, Y., Li, T., Adjeroh, D., & Iyengar, S. S.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2017-06-29
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2732916693
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 46.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Malware Detection Using Data Mining Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3073559
- The paper
- Ye, Y., Li, T., Adjeroh, D., & Iyengar, S. S. (2018). A Survey on Malware Detection Using Data Mining Techniques. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3073559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.