The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurosurgeon: Collaborative Intelligence Between the Cloud and Mobile Edge
Abstract
The computation for today's intelligent personal assistants such as Apple Siri, Google Now, and Microsoft Cortana, is performed in the cloud. This cloud-only approach requires significant amounts of data to be sent to the cloud over the wireless network and puts significant computational pressure on the datacenter. However, as the computational resources in mobile devices become more powerful and energy efficient, questions arise as to whether this cloud-only processing is desirable moving forward, and what are the implications of pushing some or all of this compute to the mobile devices on the edge. In this paper, we examine the status quo approach of cloud-only processing and investigate computation partitioning strategies that effectively leverage both the cycles in the cloud and on the mobile device to achieve low latency, low energy consumption, and high datacenter throughput for this class of intelligent applications. Our study uses 8 intelligent applications spanning computer vision, speech, and natural language domains, all employing state-of-the-art Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) as the core machine learning technique. We find that given the characteristics of DNN algorithms, a fine-grained, layer-level computation partitioning strategy based on the data and computation variations of each layer within a DNN has significant latency and energy advantages over the status quo approach. Using this insight, we design Neurosurgeon, a lightweight scheduler to automatically partition DNN computation between mobile devices and datacenters at the granularity of neural network layers. Neurosurgeon does not require per-application profiling. It adapts to various DNN architectures, hardware platforms, wireless networks, and server load levels, intelligently partitioning computation for best latency or best mobile energy. We evaluate Neurosurgeon on a state-of-the-art mobile development platform and show that it improves end-to-end latency by 3.1X on average and up to 40.7X, reduces mobile energy consumption by 59.5% on average and up to 94.7%, and improves datacenter throughput by 1.5X on average and up to 6.7X.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload
Cuervo, E., Balasubramanian, A., Cho, D.-K., Wolman, A., Saroiu, S., Chandra, R., & Bahl, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1814433.1814441 · Cited by 2,281
(2011) · doi:10.1145/1966445.1966473 · Cited by 1,870
Cited by
Edge AI: On-Demand Accelerating Deep Neural Network Inference via Edge Computing
Li, E., Zeng, L., Zhou, Z., & Chen, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2019.2946140 · Cited by 929
Communication-efficient edge ai: algorithms and systems
Shi, Y., Yang, K., Jiang, T., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3007787 · Cited by 488
Efficient Acceleration of Deep Learning Inference on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices: A Review
Shuvo, M. M. H., Islam, S. K., Cheng, J., & Morshed, B. I. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3226481 · Cited by 436
Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future
Nain, G., Pattanaik, K. K., & Sharma, G. K. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.01.010 · Cited by 283
BottleNet++: An End-to-End Approach for Feature Compression in Device-Edge Co-Inference Systems
Shao, J., & Zhang, J. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops) · doi:10.1109/iccworkshops49005.2020.9145068 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, Y., Hauswald, J., Gao, C., Rovinski, A., Mudge, T., Mars, J., & Tang, L.
- Venue
- ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
- Published
- 2017-04-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 615-629
- ISSN
- 0163-5964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4236099117
- Cited by
- 806
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurosurgeon: Collaborative Intelligence Between the Cloud and Mobile Edge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3093337.3037698
- The paper
- Kang, Y., Hauswald, J., Gao, C., Rovinski, A., Mudge, T., Mars, J., & Tang, L. (2017). Neurosurgeon: Collaborative Intelligence Between the Cloud and Mobile Edge. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. https://doi.org/10.1145/3093337.3037698
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.