The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources
Open accessAbstract
Providing an integrated access to multiple heterogeneous sources is a challenging issue in global information systems for cooperation and interoperability. In this context, two fundamental problems arise. First, how to determine if the sources contain semantically related information, that is, information related to the same or similar real-world concept(s). Second, how to handle semantic heterogeneity to support integration and uniform query interfaces. Complicating factors with respect to conventional view integration techniques are related to the fact that the sources to be integrated already exist and that semantic heterogeneity occurs on the large-scale, involving terminology, structure, and context of the involved sources, with respect to geographical, organizational, and functional aspects related to information use. Moreover, to meet the requirements of global, Internet-based information systems, it is important that tools developed for supporting these activities are semi-automatic and scalable as much as possible. The goal of this paper is to describe the MOMIS [4, 5] (Mediator envirOnment for Multiple Information Sources) approach to the integration and query of multiple, heterogeneous information sources, containing structured and semistructured data. MOMIS has been conceived as a joint collaboration between University of Milano and Modena in the framework of the INTERDATA national research project, aiming at providing methods and tools for data management in Internet-based information systems. Like other integration projects [1, 10, 14], MOMIS follows a “semantic approach” to information integration based on the conceptual schema, or metadata, of the information sources, and on the following architectural elements: i) a common object-oriented data model, defined according to the ODL I 3 language, to describe source schemas for integration purposes. The data model and ODL I 3 have been defined in MOMIS as subset of the ODMG-93 ones, following the proposal for a standard mediator language developed by the I 3 /POB working group [7]. In addition, ODL I 3 introduces new constructors to support the semantic integration process [4, 5]; ii) one or more wrappers, to translate schema descriptions into the common ODL I 3 representation; iii) a mediator and a query-processing component, based on two pre-existing tools, namely ARTEMIS [8] and ODB-Tools [3] (available on Internet at http://sparc20.dsi.unimo.it/), to provide an I 3 architecture for integration and query optimization. In this paper, we focus on capturing and reasoning about semantic aspects of schema descriptions of heterogeneous information sources for supporting integration and query optimization. Both semistructured and structured data sources are taken into account [5]. A Common Thesaurus is constructed, which has the role of a shared ontology for the information sources. The Common Thesaurus is built by analyzing ODL I 3 descriptions of the sources, by exploiting the Description Logics OLCD (Object Language with Complements allowing Descriptive cycles) [2, 6], derived from KL-ONE family [17]. The knowledge in the Common Thesaurus is then exploited for the identification of semantically related information in ODL I 3 descriptions of different sources and for their integration at the global level. Mapping rules and integrity constraints are defined at the global level to express the relationships holding between the integrated description and the sources descriptions. ODB-Tools, supporting OLCD and description logic inference techniques, allows the analysis of sources descriptions for generating a consistent Common Thesaurus and provides support for semantic optimization of queries at the global level, based on defined mapping rules and integrity constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WordNet: a lexical database for English
Miller, G. A. (1995) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/219717.219748 · Cited by 14,015
5.7 The WORDNET lexical database of English
(2019) · Computer Corpus Lexicography · doi:10.1515/9781474471459-050 · Cited by 1,865
Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions
Levy, A. Y., Rajaraman, A., & Ordille, J. J. (1996) · Cited by 1,110
RETRIEVING AND INTEGRATING DATA FROM MULTIPLE INFORMATION SOURCES
ARENS, Y., CHEE, C. Y., HSU, C.-N., & KNOBLOCK, C. A. (1993) · International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems · doi:10.1142/s0218215793000071 · Cited by 410
Don't Scrap It, Wrap It! A Wrapper Architecture for Legacy Data Sources
Roth, M. T., & Schwarz, P. (1997) · Cited by 372
Managing semantic heterogeneity in databases: a theoretical prospective
Hull, R. (1997) · Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems · doi:10.1145/263661.263668 · Cited by 359
An intelligent approach to information integration
Bergamaschi, S., Castano, S., di Vimercati, S. D. C., Montanari, S., & Vincini, M. (1998) · Cited by 85
Self-citationSemantic dictionary design for database interoperability
Castano, S., & Antonellis, V. D. (2002) · Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1997.581738 · Cited by 67
Self-citationCoordinating context building in heterogeneous information systems
Ouksel, A. M., & Naiman, C. F. (1994) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/bf00962977 · Cited by 58
Mediator languages—a proposal for a standard
Buneman, P., Raschid, L., & Ullman, J. D. (1997) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/248603.248611 · Cited by 49
Cited by
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Rahm, E., & Bernstein, P. A. (2001) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s007780100057 · Cited by 3,352
(2006) · doi:10.5555/1182635.1164130 · Cited by 553
S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching
Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., & Yatskevich, M. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5_5 · Cited by 473
Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation
Giunchiglia, F., Yatskevich, M., & Shvaiko, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74987-5_1 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergamaschi, S., Castano, S., & Vincini, M.
- Venue
- ACM SIGMOD Record
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-59
- ISSN
- 0163-5808 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036469985
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 21.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/309844.309897
- The paper
- Bergamaschi, S., Castano, S., & Vincini, M. (1999). Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources. ACM SIGMOD Record. https://doi.org/10.1145/309844.309897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.