Cited by 10Error Correcting Code TechniquesIoT Networks and ProtocolsEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks

Joint FEC/CRC coding scheme for energy constrained IOT devices

Ez-zazi, Imad, Arioua, Mounir, El Oualkadi, Ahmed, el Assari, Younes·2017·Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems

Abstract

Energy efficiency is of utmost importance in internet of things (IOT) as it tends to rely on battery-powered devices constrained by their limited lifetime, which entails the need of energy-aware protocols. As transmission energy is the most energy consuming, and reliability is of paramount in IOT applications, we advocate the use of error control coding as means to provide reliability and transmission energy saving. Forward error correction (FEC) aims at saving transmission energy and correcting channel errors at the receiver by using channel coding and decoding, yet the complexity of the decoding process affects both the energy and reliability performance of wearable devices. In this work, we propose a joint FEC/CRC scheme to alleviate the decoding energy depletion and provide communication reliability. We thoroughly evaluate the performance of the proposed coding scheme in terms of energy efficiency and reliability in a multi-hop network.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3102304.3102329

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FEC is a channel coding technique that adds redundancy to transmitted data to achieve error control.

    “An FEC is a channel coding technique that adds redundancy to transmitted data to achieve error control [28] by which the transmitter sends data along with the redundant information and the receiver distinguishes and identifies only the original data and requires the redundant bits only in the case of some bit error or data loss.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ez-zazi, I., Arioua, M., El Oualkadi, A., & el Assari, Y.
Affiliations
  • National School of Applied Sciences, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco
  • Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
Venue
Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-07-19
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W2751645157
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (ICFNDS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
forward error correction, cyclic redundancy check, energy efficiency, Internet of Things, battery-powered devices, communication reliability, multi-hop networks, wearable devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review