The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated identification of security issues from commit messages and bug reports
Abstract
The number of vulnerabilities in open source libraries is increasing rapidly. However, the majority of them do not go through public disclosure. These unidentified vulnerabilities put developers' products at risk of being hacked since they are increasingly relying on open source libraries to assemble and build software quickly. To find unidentified vulnerabilities in open source libraries and secure modern software development, we describe an efficient automatic vulnerability identification system geared towards tracking large-scale projects in real time using natural language processing and machine learning techniques. Built upon the latent information underlying commit messages and bug reports in open source projects using GitHub, JIRA, and Bugzilla, our K-fold stacking classifier achieves promising results on vulnerability identification. Compared to the state of the art SVM-based classifier in prior work on vulnerability identification in commit messages, we improve precision by 54.55% while maintaining the same recall rate. For bug reports, we achieve a much higher precision of 0.70 and recall rate of 0.71 compared to existing work. Moreover, observations from running the trained model at SourceClear in production for over 3 months has shown 0.83 precision, 0.74 recall rate, and detected 349 hidden vulnerabilities, proving the effectiveness and generality of the proposed approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Learning from imbalanced data: open challenges and future directions
Krawczyk, B. (2016) · Progress in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s13748-016-0094-0 · Cited by 2,459
Cited by
Automated Vulnerability Detection in Source Code Using Deep Representation Learning
Russell, R., Kim, L., Hamilton, L., Lazovich, T., Harer, J., Ozdemir, O., Ellingwood, P., & McConley, M. (2018) · 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) · doi:10.1109/icmla.2018.00120 · Cited by 623
Combining Graph-Based Learning With Automated Data Collection for Code Vulnerability Detection
Wang, H., Ye, G., Tang, Z., Tan, S. H., Huang, S., Fang, D., Feng, Y., Bian, L., & Wang, Z. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2020.3044773 · Cited by 308
Generative AI in cybersecurity: A comprehensive review of LLM applications and vulnerabilities
Ferrag, M. A., Alwahedi, F., Battah, A., Cherif, B., Mechri, A., Tihanyi, N., Bisztray, T., & Debbah, M. (2025) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2025.01.001 · Cited by 148
Committed to Trust: A Qualitative Study on Security & Trust in Open Source Software Projects
Wermke, D., Wöhler, N., Klemmer, J. H., Fourné, M., Acar, Y., & Fahl, S. (2022) · 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp46214.2022.9833686 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Y., & Sharma, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-08-21
- Pages
- 914-919
- OpenAlex
- W2740329368
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated identification of security issues from commit messages and bug reports. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3106237.3117771
- The paper
- Zhou, Y., & Sharma, A. (2017). Automated identification of security issues from commit messages and bug reports. Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3106237.3117771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.