The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LCIS: a boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction
Open accessAbstract
High contrast scenes are difficult to depict on low contrast displays without loss of important fine details and textures.Skilled artists preserve these details by drawing scene contents in coarseto-fine order using a hierarchy of scene boundaries and shadings.We build a similar hierarchy using multiple instances of a new low curvature image simplifier (LCIS), a partial differential equation inspired by anisotropic diffusion.Each LCIS reduces the scene to many smooth regions that are bounded by sharp gradient discontinuities, and a single parameter K chosen for each LCIS controls region size and boundary complexity.With a few chosen K values (K1 > K 2 > K 3 :::) LCIS makes a set of progressively simpler images, and image differences form a hierarchy of increasingly important details, boundaries and large features.We construct a high detail, low contrast display image from this hierarchy by compressing only the large features, then adding back all small details.Unlike linear filter hierarchies such as wavelets, filter banks, or image pyramids, LCIS hierarchies do not smooth across scene boundaries, avoiding "halo" artifacts common to previous contrast reducing methods and some tone reproduction operators.We demonstrate LCIS effectiveness on several example images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edge-preserving decompositions for multi-scale tone and detail manipulation
Farbman, Z., Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., & Szeliski, R. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/1360612.1360666 · Cited by 1,443
Gradient domain high dynamic range compression
Fattal, R., Lischinski, D., & Werman, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/566570.566573 · Cited by 1,120
Photographic tone reproduction for digital images
Reinhard, E., Stark, M., Shirley, P., & Ferwerda, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/566654.566575 · Cited by 1,012
Image smoothing via L0gradient minimization
Xu, L., Lu, C., Xu, Y., & Jia, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the 2011 SIGGRAPH Asia Conference · doi:10.1145/2024156.2024208 · Cited by 873
Image smoothing via L0gradient minimization
Xu, L., Lu, C., Xu, Y., & Jia, J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2070781.2024208 · Cited by 786
Metadata
- Authors
- Tumblin, J., & Turk, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '99
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 83-90
- OpenAlex
- W2023292900
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LCIS: a boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/311535.311544
- The paper
- Tumblin, J., & Turk, G. (1999). LCIS: a boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques - SIGGRAPH '99. https://doi.org/10.1145/311535.311544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.