Moving beyond the Turing Test with the Allen AI Science Challenge
Abstract
Answering questions correctly from standardized eighth-grade science tests is itself a test of machine intelligence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positioning is currently a human task, for it involves judgment, intuition, and creativity that machines are not particularly good at yet.
“Positioning is currently a human task, for it involves judgment, intuition, and creativity that machines are not particularly good at it yet (Davis and Marcus 2015; Schoenick et al. 2017).”
From A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing (2021) · cites this paper as Schoenick et al. 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Schoenick, C., Clark, P., Tafjord, O., Turney, P., & Etzioni, O.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 60-64
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2338747497
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- Turing test, machine intelligence, AI evaluation, standardized testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
