The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems
Open accessAbstract
This survey covers research into mixed criticality systems that has been published since Vestal’s seminal paper in 2007, up until the end of 2016. The survey is organised along the lines of the major research areas within this topic. These include single processor analysis (including fixed priority and Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling, shared resources, and static and synchronous scheduling), multiprocessor analysis, realistic models, and systems issues. The survey also explores the relationship between research into mixed criticality systems and other topics such as hard and soft time constraints, fault tolerant scheduling, hierarchical scheduling, cyber physical systems, probabilistic real-time systems, and industrial safety standards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
Scheduling algorithms for multiprogramming in a hard-real-time environment
Liu, C. L., & Layland, J. W. (1973) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/321738.321743 · Cited by 8,433
Priority inheritance protocols: an approach to real-time synchronization
Sha, L., Rajkumar, R., & Lehoczky, J. P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/12.57058 · Cited by 2,244
Integrity Considerations for Secure Computer Systems
Biba, K. J. (1977) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 1,221
Finding Response Times in a Real-Time System
Joseph, M. (1986) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/29.5.390 · Cited by 1,169
On the complexity of fixed-priority scheduling of periodic, real-time tasks
Leung, J. Y.-T., & Whitehead, J. (1982) · Performance Evaluation · doi:10.1016/0166-5316(82)90024-4 · Cited by 1,154
Applying new scheduling theory to static priority pre-emptive scheduling
Audsley, N., Burns, A., Richardson, M., Tindell, K., & Wellings, A. J. (1993) · Software Engineering Journal · doi:10.1049/sej.1993.0034 · Cited by 1,106
Self-citationController Area Network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised
Davis, R. I., Burns, A., Bril, R. J., & Lukkien, J. J. (2007) · Real-Time Systems · doi:10.1007/s11241-007-9012-7 · Cited by 786
Self-citationTentative steps toward a development method for interfering programs
Jones, C. B. (1983) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/69575.69577 · Cited by 617
Speed is as powerful as clairvoyance
Kalyanasundaram, B., & Pruhs, K. (2000) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/347476.347479 · Cited by 561
Cited by
Virtualizing mixed-criticality systems: A survey on industrial trends and issues
Cinque, M., Cotroneo, D., De Simone, L., & Rosiello, S. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.12.002 · Cited by 80
Lumpp, F., Fummi, F., Patel, H. D., & Bombieri, N. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981581 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Burns, A., & Davis, R. I.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2017-11-22
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2769328306
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 30.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3131347
- The paper
- Burns, A., & Davis, R. I. (2018). A Survey of Research into Mixed Criticality Systems. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
