Cited by 65Recommender Systems and TechniquesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Data Mining

A Survey of Link Recommendation for Social Networks: Methods, Theoretical Foundations, and Future Research Directions

Li, Zhepeng (Lionel), Fang, Xiao, Sheng, Olivia R. Liu·2018·ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

Abstract

Link recommendation has attracted significant attention from both industry practitioners and academic researchers. In industry, link recommendation has become a standard and most important feature in online social networks, prominent examples of which include “People You May Know” on LinkedIn and “You May Know” on Google+. In academia, link recommendation has been and remains a highly active research area. This article surveys state-of-the-art link recommendation methods, which can be broadly categorized into learning-based methods and proximity-based methods. We further identify social and economic theories, such as social interaction theory, that underlie these methods and explain from a theoretical perspective why a link recommendation method works. Finally, we propose to extend link recommendation research in several directions that include utility-based link recommendation, diversity of link recommendation, link recommendation from incomplete data, and experimental study of link recommendation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3131782

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transmission pathways are rewired by recommender systems selecting what and from whom humans learn.

    “Meanwhile, transmission pathways are rewired by recommender systems selecting what and from whom humans learn.”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 160 · Cited by 65

Authors
Li, Z. (., Fang, X., & Sheng, O. R. L.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
Published
2017-10-25
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
  • 2158-6578
OpenAlex
W2149800717
Cited by
65
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
14.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Data Mining
Keywords
link recommendation, social networking sites, social interaction theory, recommendation diversity, missing data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review