A Survey of Link Recommendation for Social Networks: Methods, Theoretical Foundations, and Future Research Directions
Abstract
Link recommendation has attracted significant attention from both industry practitioners and academic researchers. In industry, link recommendation has become a standard and most important feature in online social networks, prominent examples of which include “People You May Know” on LinkedIn and “You May Know” on Google+. In academia, link recommendation has been and remains a highly active research area. This article surveys state-of-the-art link recommendation methods, which can be broadly categorized into learning-based methods and proximity-based methods. We further identify social and economic theories, such as social interaction theory, that underlie these methods and explain from a theoretical perspective why a link recommendation method works. Finally, we propose to extend link recommendation research in several directions that include utility-based link recommendation, diversity of link recommendation, link recommendation from incomplete data, and experimental study of link recommendation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transmission pathways are rewired by recommender systems selecting what and from whom humans learn.
“Meanwhile, transmission pathways are rewired by recommender systems selecting what and from whom humans learn.”
From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 160 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Li, Z. (., Fang, X., & Sheng, O. R. L.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- University of Delaware (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
- Published
- 2017-10-25
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-26
- ISSN
- 2158-656X (ISSN-L)
- 2158-6578
- OpenAlex
- W2149800717
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 160
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 14.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Data Mining
- Keywords
- link recommendation, social networking sites, social interaction theory, recommendation diversity, missing data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review