The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendation
Open accessAbstract
Given e-commerce scenarios that user profiles are invisible, session-based recommendation is proposed to generate recommendation results from short sessions. Previous work only considers the user's sequential behavior in the current session, whereas the user's main purpose in the current session is not emphasized. In this paper, we propose a novel neural networks framework, i.e., Neural Attentive Recommendation Machine (NARM), to tackle this problem. Specifically, we explore a hybrid encoder with an attention mechanism to model the user's sequential behavior and capture the user's main purpose in the current session, which are combined as a unified session representation later. We then compute the recommendation scores for each candidate item with a bi-linear matching scheme based on this unified session representation. We train NARM by jointly learning the item and session representations as well as their matchings. We carried out extensive experiments on two benchmark datasets. Our experimental results show that NARM outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on both datasets. Furthermore, we also find that NARM achieves a significant improvement on long sessions, which demonstrates its advantages in modeling the user's sequential behavior and main purpose simultaneously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G., Mohamed, A.-R., Jaitly, N., Senior, A., Vanhoucke, V., Nguyen, P., Sainath, T., et al. (2012) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2012.2205597 · Cited by 10,260
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering
Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2003.1167344 · Cited by 5,403
Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering
Salakhutdinov, R., Mnih, A., & Hinton, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273596 · Cited by 1,885
Neural Rating Regression with Abstractive Tips Generation for Recommendation
Li, P., Wang, Z., Ren, Z., Bing, L., & Lam, W. (2017) · Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3077136.3080822 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Cited by
BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer
Sun, F., Liu, J., Wu, J., Pei, C., Lin, X., Ou, W., & Jiang, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357895 · Cited by 2,558
RecBole: Towards a Unified, Comprehensive and Efficient Framework for Recommendation Algorithms
Zhao, W. X., Mu, S., Hou, Y., Lin, Z., Chen, Y., Pan, X., Li, K., Lu, Y., Wang, H., Tian, C., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482016 · Cited by 455
A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Graph Representation Learning
Ju, W., Fang, Z., Gu, Y., Liu, Z., Long, Q., Qiao, Z., Qin, Y., Shen, J., Sun, F., Xiao, Z., et al. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106207 · Cited by 341
Rethinking the Item Order in Session-based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networks
Qiu, R., Li, J., Huang, Z., & YIn, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3358010 · Cited by 339
Self-citationHierarchical Gating Networks for Sequential Recommendation
Ma, C., Kang, P., & Liu, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330984 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Ren, P., Chen, Z., Ren, Z., Lian, T., & Ma, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-11-06
- Pages
- 1419-1428
- OpenAlex
- W2964044287
- Cited by
- 1,501
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 58.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3132847.3132926
- The paper
- Li, J., Ren, P., Chen, Z., Ren, Z., Lian, T., & Ma, J. (2017). Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendation. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
