Cited by 1,377Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsNeural Networks and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learning

Open access
Hitaj, Briland, Ateniese, Giuseppe, Perez-Cruz, Fernando·2017·Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security

Abstract

Deep Learning has recently become hugely popular in machine learning for its ability to solve end-to-end learning systems, in which the features and the classifiers are learned simultaneously, providing significant improvements in classification accuracy in the presence of highly-structured and large databases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3133956.3134012

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Florian Tramèr Fan Zhang Ari Juels Michael K Reiter and Thomas Ristenpart 2016. Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs USENIX Security.
  2. Weilin Xu, Yanjun Qi, and David Evans 2016. Automatically evading classifiers. In NDSS'16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,002

Metadata

Authors
Hitaj, B., Ateniese, G., & Perez-Cruz, F.
Affiliations
  • Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-10-30
Pages
603-618
ISSN
1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2591882872
Cited by
1,377
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 192 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 229 · 2022: 176 · 2021: 204 · 2020: 147 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 3
FWCI
22.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
generative adversarial networks, deep learning, end-to-end learning, representation learning, classifier training, structured data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review