Estimating verbal expressions of task and social cohesion in meetings by quantifying paralinguistic mimicry
Abstract
In this paper we propose a novel method of estimating verbal expressions of task and social cohesion by quantifying the dynamic alignment of nonverbal behaviors in speech. As team cohesion has been linked to team effectiveness and productivity, automatically estimating team cohesion can be a useful tool for assessing meeting quality and broader team functioning. In total, more than 20 hours of business meetings (3-8 people) were recorded and annotated for behavioral indicators of group cohesion, distinguishing between social and task cohesion. We hypothesized that behaviors commonly referred to as mimicry can be indicative of verbal expressions of social and task cohesion. Where most prior work targets mimicry of dyads, we investigated the effectiveness of quantifying group-level phenomena. A dynamic approach was adopted in which both the cohesion expressions and the paralinguistic mimicry were quantified on small time windows. By extracting features solely related to the alignment of paralinguistic speech behavior, we found that 2-minute high and low social cohesive regions could be classified with a 0.71 Area under the ROC curve, performing on par with the state-of-the-art where turn-taking features were used. Estimating task cohesion was more challenging, obtaining an accuracy of 0.64 AUC, outperforming the state-of-the-art. Our results suggest that our proposed methodology is successful in quantifying group-level paralinguistic mimicry. As both the state-of-the-art turn-t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study's small sample size (16 students across four teams) constrains generalisability.
“This exploratory, descriptive study is limited by its small sample size (16 students across four teams), which, while consistent with prior ecological classroom studies (Nanninga et al., 2017, pp. 206 -215; Zhang et al., 2018), constrains generalisability.”
From An unobtrusive approach to modelling team cohesion and collaboration in ecological classroom settings (2026) · cites this paper as Nanninga et al., 2017
Cites
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985) · Journal of Sport Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsp.7.3.244 · Cited by 1,050 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Third, although cohesion is an inherently temporal and dynamic construct [47], existing literature shows a typical reliance on a perceptual rating approach, either based on self-report questionnaire data [11]”
BackgroundSynchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual
Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bulbulia, J., Schjødt, U., Jegindø, E.-M., Wallot, S., Van Orden, G., & Roepstorff, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1016955108 · Cited by 632 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This metric is mostly used within other modalities [33, 48], but in a few cases in audio [23].”
MethodInterpersonal synchrony: a survey of evaluation methods across disciplines.
Delaherche, E., Chetouani, M., Mahdhaoui, A., Saint-Georges, C., Viaux, S., & Cohen, D. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2012.12 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111316 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Measuring Team Cohesion: Observations from the Science
Salas, E., Grossman, R., Hughes, A. M., & Coultas, C. W. (2015) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815578267 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Azad, A., Kovanovic, V., Korolkiewicz, M., Zamecnik, A., Joksimovic, S., & Cukurova, M. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102268 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nanninga, M. C., Zhang, Y., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Szlávik, Z., & Hung, H.
- Affiliations
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-11-03
- Pages
- 206-215
- OpenAlex
- W2767664584
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NWO STW (2015/16734/STW)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- social cohesion, task cohesion, business meetings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review