The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Statistical Model Checking
Abstract
Interactive, distributed, and embedded systems often behave stochastically, for example, when inputs, message delays, or failures conform to a probability distribution. However, reasoning analytically about the behavior of complex stochastic systems is generally infeasible. While simulations of systems are commonly used in engineering practice, they have not traditionally been used to reason about formal specifications. Statistical model checking (SMC) addresses this weakness by using a simulation-based approach to reason about precise properties specified in a stochastic temporal logic. A specification for a communication system may state that within some time bound, the probability that the number of messages in a queue will be greater than 5 must be less than 0.01. Using SMC, executions of a stochastic system are first sampled, after which statistical techniques are applied to determine whether such a property holds. While the output of sample-based methods are not always correct, statistical inference can quantify the confidence in the result produced. In effect, SMC provides a more widely applicable and scalable alternative to analysis of properties of stochastic systems using numerical and symbolic methods. SMC techniques have been successfully applied to analyze systems with large state spaces in areas such as computer networking, security, and systems biology. In this article, we survey SMC algorithms, techniques, and tools, while emphasizing current limitations and tradeoffs between precision and scalability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 38,662
Probability Inequalities for sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1994) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0865-5_26 · Cited by 6,666
Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500830 · Cited by 4,852
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
Hutchison, T. W., & Popper, K. R. (1964) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2551371 · Cited by 4,197
Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge.
Hesse, M., & Popper, K. R. (1965) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218271 · Cited by 4,189
Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications
Clarke, E. M., Emerson, E. A., & Sistla, A. P. (1986) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/5397.5399 · Cited by 3,605
Probability and Statistics With Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications.
Thompson, W. A., & Trivedi, K. S. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288237 · Cited by 2,601
PRISM 4.0: Verification of Probabilistic Real-Time Systems
Kwiatkowska, M., Norman, G., & Parker, D. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22110-1_47 · Cited by 2,361
Statistical Decision Functions
Wald, A. (1949) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730030 · Cited by 2,176
Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses
Wald, A. (1945) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731118 · Cited by 1,671
Cited by
Relating simulation studies by provenance—Developing a family of Wnt signaling models
Budde, K., Smith, J., Wilsdorf, P., Haack, F., & Uhrmacher, A. M. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009227 · Cited by 23
“, in a temporal logic) and automatically be checked [90, 91].”
BackgroundFormal Methods for Autonomous Systems
Wongpiromsarn, T., Ghasemi, M., Cubuktepe, M., Bakirtzis, G., Carr, S., Karabag, M. O., Neary, C., Gohari, P., & Topcu, U. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Systems and Control · doi:10.1561/2600000029 · Cited by 17
Conceptual Models in Simulation Studies: Making it Explicit
Wilsdorf, P., Haack, F., & Uhrmacher, A. M. (2020) · 2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · doi:10.1109/wsc48552.2020.9383984 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Agha, G., & Palmskog, K.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
- Published
- 2018-01-31
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-39
- ISSN
- 1049-3301 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1195
- OpenAlex
- W2787596386
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 22.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Statistical Model Checking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3158668
- The paper
- Agha, G., & Palmskog, K. (2018). A Survey of Statistical Model Checking. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3158668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.