Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling

Open access
Dovrolis, Constantinos, Stiliadis, Dimitrios, Ramanathan, Parameswaran·1999·Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication

Abstract

Internet applications and users have very diverse service expectations, making the current same-service-to-all model inadequate and limiting. In the relative differentiated services approach, the network traffic is grouped in a small number of service classes which are ordered based on their packet forwarding quality, in terms of per-hop metrics for the queueing delays and packet losses. The users and applications, in this context, can adaptivelychoose the class that best meets their quality and pricing constraints, based on the assurance that higher classes will be better, or at least no worse, than lower classes. In this work, we propose the proportional differentiation model as a way to refine and quantify this basic premise of relative differentiated services. The proportional differentiation model aims to provide the network operator with the 'tuning knobs' for adjusting the quality spacing between classes, independent of the class loads; this cannot be achieved with other relative differentiation models, such as strict prioritization or capacity differentiation. We apply the proportional model on queueing-delay differentiation only, leaving the problem of coupled delay and loss differentiation for future work. We discuss the dynamics of the proportional delay differentiation model and state the conditions under which it is feasible. Then, we identify and evaluate (using simulations) two packet schedulers that approximate the proportional differentiation model in heavy-load conditions, even in short timescales. Finally, we demonstrate that such per-hop and class-based mechanisms can provide consistent end-to-end differentiation to individual flows from different classes, independently of the network path and flow characteristics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/316188.316211

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Dovrolis, C., Stiliadis, D., & Ramanathan, P.
Venue
Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
Publisher
ACM
Published
1999-08-30
Pages
109-120
OpenAlex
W2163064094
Cited by
265
References
14
FWCI
19.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/316188.316211
The paper
Dovrolis, C., Stiliadis, D., & Ramanathan, P. (1999). Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling. Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication. https://doi.org/10.1145/316188.316211

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.