The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling
Open accessAbstract
Internet applications and users have very diverse service expectations, making the current same-service-to-all model inadequate and limiting. In the relative differentiated services approach, the network traffic is grouped in a small number of service classes which are ordered based on their packet forwarding quality, in terms of per-hop metrics for the queueing delays and packet losses. The users and applications, in this context, can adaptivelychoose the class that best meets their quality and pricing constraints, based on the assurance that higher classes will be better, or at least no worse, than lower classes. In this work, we propose the proportional differentiation model as a way to refine and quantify this basic premise of relative differentiated services. The proportional differentiation model aims to provide the network operator with the 'tuning knobs' for adjusting the quality spacing between classes, independent of the class loads; this cannot be achieved with other relative differentiation models, such as strict prioritization or capacity differentiation. We apply the proportional model on queueing-delay differentiation only, leaving the problem of coupled delay and loss differentiation for future work. We discuss the dynamics of the proportional delay differentiation model and state the conditions under which it is feasible. Then, we identify and evaluate (using simulations) two packet schedulers that approximate the proportional differentiation model in heavy-load conditions, even in short timescales. Finally, we demonstrate that such per-hop and class-based mechanisms can provide consistent end-to-end differentiation to individual flows from different classes, independently of the network path and flow characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Architecture for Differentiated Service
Blake, S. L., Black, D. L., Carlson, M., Davies, E., Wang, Z., & Weiss, W. (1998) · Cited by 5,487
Parekh, A. K., & Gallager, R. G. (1993) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.234856 · Cited by 3,705
Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm
Demers, A., Keshav, S., & Shenker, S. (1989) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/75247.75248 · Cited by 2,614
Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm
Demers, A., Keshav, S., & Shenker, S. (1989) · Symposium proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols · doi:10.1145/75246.75248 · Cited by 1,729
Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers
Nichols, K., Blake, S., Baker, F., & Black, D. (1998) · doi:10.17487/rfc2474 · Cited by 1,530
TCP Vegas: new techniques for congestion detection and avoidance
Brakmo, L. S., O'Malley, S. W., & Peterson, L. L. (1994) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/190809.190317 · Cited by 1,198
Down, D., Bolch, G., Greiner, S., Meer, H. D., & Trivedi, K. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2669582 · Cited by 1,148
TCP and explicit congestion notification
Floyd, S. (1994) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/205511.205512 · Cited by 1,016
Link-sharing and resource management models for packet networks
Floyd, S., & Jacobson, V. (1995) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/90.413212 · Cited by 977
Queueing Networks and Markov Chains
Bolch, G., Greiner, S., de Meer, H., & Trivedi, K. S. (1998) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200581 · Cited by 934
Cited by
An effective hop-by-hop Interest shaping mechanism for CCN communications
Rozhnova, N., & Fdida, S. (2012) · 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM Workshops · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2012.6193514 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Dovrolis, C., Stiliadis, D., & Ramanathan, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1999-08-30
- Pages
- 109-120
- OpenAlex
- W2163064094
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 19.76
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/316188.316211
- The paper
- Dovrolis, C., Stiliadis, D., & Ramanathan, P. (1999). Proportional differentiated services: delay differentiation and packet scheduling. Proceedings of the conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication. https://doi.org/10.1145/316188.316211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.