Cited by 96Digital Humanities and ScholarshipWeb Applications and Data ManagementCultural Insights and Digital Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationally encoded links and the rhetoric of hypertext

Landow, George p.·1987·Proceeding of the ACM conference on Hypertext - HYPERTEXT '87

Abstract

Article Relationally encoded links and the rhetoric of hypertext Share on Author: George p. Landow Department of English and the Institute for Research in Information and Scholarship (IRIS), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island Department of English and the Institute for Research in Information and Scholarship (IRIS), Brown University, Providence, Rhode IslandView Profile Authors Info & Claims HYPERTEXT '87: Proceedings of the ACM conference on HypertextNovember 1987 Pages 331–343https://doi.org/10.1145/317426.317450Published:01 November 1987 49citation473DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations49Total Downloads473Last 12 Months8Last 6 weeks2 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/317426.317450

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Links are directional; the text of a link indicates the direction of its destination and creates a causal connection between its departure node and arrival node.

    “Because the links of hypertext literature are directional, the text of a link indicates the direction of its destination and creates a causal connection between its departure node and arrival node (Landow 1987).”

    From A Framework for Choice Hermeneutics (2022) · cites this paper as Landow 1987

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A Framework for Choice Hermeneutics

    Focht, C., & Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2022) · DiGRA Digital Library · doi:10.26503/dl.v2022i1.1319

    “Because the links of hypertext literature are directional, the text of a link indicates the direction of its destination and creates a causal connection between its departure node and arrival node (Landow 1987).”

Metadata

Authors
Landow, G. P.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Landow, George p.
Venue
Proceeding of the ACM conference on Hypertext - HYPERTEXT '87
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1987
Pages
331-343
OpenAlex
W2055108354
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
32.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Keywords
hypertext, relational encoding, rhetoric, hyperlinks, information organization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review