Continuous delivery of personalized assessment and feedback in agile software engineering projects
Abstract
In recent years, Agile development has been adopted in project practices of Software Engineering (SE) courses. However, it is a great challenge to provide timely assessment and feedback to project teams and individual students with a frequency that catches up with iterative, incremental, and cooperative software development with continuous deliveries. Conventional project reviews are mostly dependent upon instructors and teaching assistants in a manual reviewing/mentoring approach, which are simply not scalable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of coordination between security team and DevOps team is a DevOps security challenge.
“The challenging factor lack of coordination between security team and DevOps team is causing more security threats like untrusted inputs [54], [55], [74].”
From Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE (2020) · cites this paper as [74]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Bai, X., Li, M., Pei, D., Li, S., & Ye, D.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-27
- Pages
- 58-67
- OpenAlex
- W2807945065
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- continuous assessment, personalized feedback, software engineering course, project review, automated feedback, iterative development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
