The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fake News Detection in Social Networks via Crowd Signals
Open accessAbstract
Our work considers leveraging crowd signals for detecting fake news and is motivated by tools recently introduced by Facebook that enable users to flag fake news. By aggregating users' flags, our goal is to select a small subset of news every day, send them to an expert (e.g., via a third-party fact-checking organization), and stop the spread of news identified as fake by an expert. The main objective of our work is to minimize the spread of misinformation by stopping the propagation of fake news in the network. It is especially challenging to achieve this objective as it requires detecting fake news with high-confidence as quickly as possible. We show that in order to leverage users' flags efficiently, it is crucial to learn about users' flagging accuracy. We develop a novel algorithm, DETECTIVE, that performs Bayesian inference for detecting fake news and jointly learns about users' flagging accuracy over time. Our algorithm employs posterior sampling to actively trade off exploitation (selecting news that maximize the objective value at a given epoch) and exploration (selecting news that maximize the value of information towards learning about users' flagging accuracy). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach via extensive experiments and show the power of leveraging community signals for fake news detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These approaches rely on the collective contributions and crowd signals (Tschiatschek et al. 2018) of a group of people for the aggregation of crowd intelligence to detect fake news (Tchakounté et al. 2020) and to reduce the spread of misinformation on social media (Pennycook and Rand 2019; Micallef et al. 2020).”
From Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Tschiatschek et al. 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J. M., & Eva Tardos, D. (2003) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/956750.956769 · Cited by 7,541
THOMPSON, W. R. (1933) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/25.3-4.285 · Cited by 2,712
Information credibility on twitter
Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011) · Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963500 · Cited by 2,593
"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection
Wang, W. Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-2067 · Cited by 2,010
Learning to Discover Social Circles in Ego Networks
Leskovec, J., & McAuley, J. (2012) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 1,701
Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news
Conroy, N. K., Rubin, V. L., & Chen, Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082 · Cited by 1,066
(2011) · Cited by 1,000
Zhao, Q., Erdogdu, M. A., He, H. Y., Rajaraman, A., & Leskovec, J. (2015) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783401 · Cited by 590
Enquiring Minds: Early Detection of Rumors in Social Media from Enquiry Posts
Zhao, Z., Resnick, P., & Mei, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2736277.2741637 · Cited by 583
Deception detection for news: Three types of fakes
Rubin, V. L., Chen, Y., & Conroy, N. K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010083 · Cited by 558
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review
Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023) · Social Network Analysis and Mining · doi:10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5 · Cited by 772
Combating Fake News: A Survey on Identification and Mitigation Techniques
Sharma, K., Qian, F., Jiang, H., Ruchansky, N., Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3305260 · Cited by 514
Meel, P., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112986 · Cited by 529
Sahoo, S. R., & Gupta, B. B. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106983 · Cited by 445
Fake news detection within online social media using supervised artificial intelligence algorithms
Ozbay, F. A., & Alataş, B. (2019) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123174 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Tschiatschek, S., Singla, A., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Merchant, A., & Krause, A.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Max Planck Institute for Software Systems (DE)
- MPI-SWS, Kaiserslautern, Germany
- International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad (IN)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2018
- Pages
- 517-524
- OpenAlex
- W2793255598
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 99.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Microsoft Research
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (307036)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- fake news detection, misinformation spread, fact-checking, Bayesian inference, posterior sampling, exploration-exploitation balance, social networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
