Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

What is Gab: A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber

Open access
Zannettou, Savvas, Bradlyn, Barry, De Cristofaro, Emiliano, Kwak, Haewoon, Sirivianos, Michael, Stringini, Gianluca, Blackburn, Jeremy·2018·Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18

Abstract

Over the past few years, a number of new "fringe" communities, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite recent research has shown that they influence how false information reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web's information ecosystem. In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created as an alternative to Twitter. It positions itself as putting "people and free speech first", welcoming users banned or suspended from other social networks. In this paper, we provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first characterization of Gab. We collect and analyze 22M posts produced by 336K users between August 2016 and January 2018, finding that Gab is predominantly used for the dissemination and discussion of news and world events, and that it attracts alt-right users, conspiracy theorists, and other trolls. We also measure the prevalence of hate speech on the platform, finding it to be much higher than Twitter, but lower than 4chan's Politically Incorrect board.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3184558.3191531

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eshwar Chandrasekharan, Mattia Samory, Anirudh Srinivasan, and Eric Gilbert. 2017. The Bag of Communities: Identifying Abusive Behavior Online with Preexisting Internet Data. In CHI. · DOI
  2. R. Killick, P. Fearnhead, and I. A. Eckley. 2012. Optimal Detection of Changepoints With a Linear Computational Cost. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. Vol. 107, 500 (2012), 1590--1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.737745 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., & Blackburn, J.
Venue
Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2018
Pages
1007-1014
OpenAlex
W2786634640
Cited by
209
References
0
FWCI
62.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
European Commision (691025)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is Gab: A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3184558.3191531
The paper
Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2018). What is Gab: A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber. Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW '18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.