The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lessons from building static analysis tools at Google
Open accessAbstract
For a static analysis project to succeed, developers must feel they benefit from and enjoy using it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“industry reports show that it is difficult to get developers to adopt static analysis in their workflows [5, 11, 30, 34].”
From Position: Vibe Coding Needs Vibe Reasoning: Improving Vibe Coding with Formal Verification (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hovemeyer, D., & Pugh, W. (2004) · Companion to the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA Companion) · doi:10.1145/1028664.1028717 · Cited by 770
A few billion lines of code later
Bessey, A., Block, K., Chelf, B., Chou, A., Fulton, B., Hallem, S., Henri-Gros, C., Kamsky, A., McPeak, S., & Engler, D. (2010) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1646353.1646374 · Cited by 634
Using Static Analysis to Find Bugs
Ayewah, N., Pugh, W., Hovemeyer, D., Morgenthaler, J. D., & Penix, J. (2008) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2008.130 · Cited by 536
Cousot, P., Cousot, R., Feret, J., Mauborgne, L., Miné, A., Monniaux, D., & Rival, X. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31987-0_3 · Cited by 426
Hovemeyer, D., & Pugh, W. (2004) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/1052883.1052895 · Cited by 397
Thorough static analysis of device drivers
Ball, T., Bounimova, E., Cook, B., Levin, V., Lichtenberg, J., McGarvey, C., Ondrusek, B., Rajamani, S. K., & Ustuner, A. (2006) · European Conference on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/1217935.1217943 · Cited by 373
Chambers, C., Raniwala, A., Perry, F., Adams, S., Henry, R. R., Bradshaw, R., & Weizenbaum, N. (2010) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/1806596.1806638 · Cited by 330
Moving Fast with Software Verification
Calcagno, C., Distefano, D., Dubreil, J., Gabi, D., Hooimeijer, P., Luca, M., O’Hearn, P. W., Papakonstantinou, I., Purbrick, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17524-9_1 · Cited by 272
Why don’t software developers use static analysis tools to find bugs
Johnson, B., Song, Y., Murphy-Hill, E. R., & Bowdidge, R. W. (2013) · Cited by 268
Why Google stores billions of lines of code in a single repository
Potvin, R., & Levenberg, J. (2016) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2854146 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Le Goues, C., Pradel, M., & Roychoudhury, A. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3318162 · Cited by 410
Scaling static analyses at Facebook
Distefano, D., Fähndrich, M., Logozzo, F., & O'Hearn, P. W. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3338112 · Cited by 212
How developers engage with static analysis tools in different contexts
Vassallo, C., Panichella, S., Palomba, F., Proksch, S., Gall, H. C., & Zaidman, A. (2019) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-019-09750-5 · Cited by 164
An empirical study on the effectiveness of static C code analyzers for vulnerability detection
Lipp, S., Bănescu, S., & Pretschner, A. (2022) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3533767.3534380 · Cited by 134
The Effectiveness of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Software Refactoring
Aniche, M. F., Maziero, E. G., Durelli, R. S., & Durelli, V. H. S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.3021736 · Cited by 137
RacerD: compositional static race detection
Blackshear, S., Gorogiannis, N., O’Hearn, P. W., & Sergey, I. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3276514 · Cited by 89
O’Hearn, P. W. (2018) · ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS) · doi:10.1145/3209108.3209109 · Cited by 82
Security Weaknesses of Copilot-Generated Code in GitHub Projects: An Empirical Study
Fu, Y., Liang, P., Tahir, A., Li, Z., Shahin, M., Yu, J., & Chen, J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3716848 · Cited by 205
Local Reasoning About the Presence of Bugs: Incorrectness Separation Logic
Raad, A., Berdine, J., Dang, H.-H., Dreyer, D. R., O’Hearn, P. W., & Villard, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53291-8_14 · Cited by 74
From DevOps to MLOps: Overview and Application to Electricity Market Forecasting
Subramanya, R., Sierla, S., & Vyatkin, V. V. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12199851 · Cited by 79
Quality-Aware DevOps Research: Where Do We Stand?
Alnafessah, A., Gias, A. U., Wang, R., Zhu, L., Casale, G., & Filieri, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3064867 · Cited by 64
Automatically Inspecting Thousands of Static Bug Warnings with Large Language Model: How Far Are We?
Wen, C., Cai, Y., Zhang, B., Su, J., Xu, Z., Liu, D., Qin, S., Ming, Z., & Tian, C. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3653718 · Cited by 66
A Survey of Practical Formal Methods for Security
Kulik, T., Dongol, B., Larsen, P. G., Macedo, H. D., Schneider, S. A., Tran-Jørgensen, P. W. V., & Woodcock, J. (2022) · Formal Aspects of Computing · doi:10.1145/3522582 · Cited by 61
Phoenix: automated data-driven synthesis of repairs for static analysis violations
Bavishi, R., Yoshida, H., & Prasad, M. R. (2019) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3338906.3338952 · Cited by 61
A critical comparison on six static analysis tools: Detection, agreement, and precision
Lenarduzzi, V., Pecorelli, F., Saarimäki, N., Lujan, S., & Palomba, F. (2022) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.111575 · Cited by 57
Detecting false alarms from automatic static analysis tools
Kang, H. J., Aw, K. L., & Lo, D. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510214 · Cited by 52
Finding real bugs in big programs with incorrectness logic
Le, Q. L., Raad, A., Villard, J., Berdine, J., Dreyer, D. R., & O’Hearn, P. W. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3527325 · Cited by 52
A large scale study on how developers discuss code smells and anti-pattern in Stack Exchange sites
Tahir, A., Dietrich, J. B., Counsell, S., Licorish, S. A., & Yamashita, A. F. (2020) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106333 · Cited by 52
A large-scale study of usability criteria addressed by static analysis tools
Nachtigall, M., Schlichtig, M., & Bodden, E. (2022) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3533767.3534374 · Cited by 47
Tamberg, K., & Bahşi, H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3541146 · Cited by 77
Mitigating False Positive Static Analysis Warnings: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities
Guo, Z., Tan, T., Liu, S., Liu, X., Lai, W., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, L., Dong, W., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3329667 · Cited by 43
Challenges with Responding to Static Analysis Tool Alerts
Imtiaz, N., Rahman, A., Farhana, E., & Williams, L. A. (2019) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr.2019.00049 · Cited by 42
On The Introduction of Automatic Program Repair in Bloomberg
Kirbas, S., Windels, E., McBello, O., Kells, K., Pagano, M. W., Szalanski, R., Nowack, V., Winter, E., Counsell, S., Bowes, D., et al. (2021) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2021.3071086 · Cited by 42
Tan, T. H., & Li, Y. (2023) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3597926.3598120 · Cited by 40
Ami, A. S., Moran, K., Poshyvanyk, D., & Nadkarni, A. (2024) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp54263.2024.00019 · Cited by 40
Trautsch, A., Herbold, S., & Grabowski, J. (2020) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-020-09880-1 · Cited by 40
Zou, W., Xuan, J., Xie, X., Chen, Z., & Xu, B. (2019) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-019-09720-x · Cited by 37
How Do Developers Act on Static Analysis Alerts? An Empirical Study of Coverity Usage
Imtiaz, N., Murphy, T. B., & Williams, L. A. (2019) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering · doi:10.1109/issre.2019.00040 · Cited by 38
A Logic for Locally Complete Abstract Interpretations
Bruni, R., Giacobazzi, R., Roberta Gori, B., & Ranzato, F. (2021) · ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS) · doi:10.1109/lics52264.2021.9470608 · Cited by 37
Code-level model checking in the software development workflow
Chong, N., Cook, B., Καλλάς, Κ., Khazem, K., Monteiro, F. R., Schwartz‐Narbonne, D., Taşiran, S., Tautschnig, M., & Tuttle, M. R. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1145/3377813.3381347 · Cited by 36
Can Clean New Code Reduce Technical Debt Density?
Δίγκας, Γ., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Ampatzoglou, A., & Avgeriou, P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.3032557 · Cited by 36
Tahaei, M., Vaniea, K. E., Beznosov, K., & Wolters, M. K. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445616 · Cited by 45
Birillo, A., Vlasov, I., Burylov, A., Selishchev, V., Goncharov, A., Tikhomirova, E., Vyahhi, N., & Bryksin, T. (2022) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3478431.3499294 · Cited by 35
Neural-Based Test Oracle Generation: A Large-Scale Evaluation and Lessons Learned
Hossain, S. B., Filieri, A., Dwyer, M. B., Elbaum, S. G., & Visser, W. (2023) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616265 · Cited by 34
Hong, S., Lee, J., Lee, J. S., & Oh, H. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3377811.3380323 · Cited by 32
Identifying Redundancies in Fork-based Development
Ren, L., Zhou, S., Kästner, C., & Wąsowski, A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER) · doi:10.1109/saner.2019.8668023 · Cited by 33
A Correctness and Incorrectness Program Logic
Bruni, R., Giacobazzi, R., Roberta Gori, B., & Ranzato, F. (2023) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3582267 · Cited by 31
Understanding Breaking Changes in the Wild
Jayasuriya, D., Terragni, V., Dietrich, J. B., Ou, S., & Blincoe, K. (2023) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3597926.3598147 · Cited by 30
Continuously reasoning about programs using differential Bayesian inference
Heo, K., Raghothaman, M., Si, X., & Naik, M. (2019) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/3314221.3314616 · Cited by 29
Code‐level model checking in the software development workflow at Amazon Web Services
Chong, N., Cook, B., Eidelman, J., Καλλάς, Κ., Khazem, K., Monteiro, F. R., Schwartz‐Narbonne, D., Taşiran, S., Tautschnig, M., & Tuttle, M. R. (2021) · Software Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.2949 · Cited by 29
Towards s/engineer/bot: Principles for Program Repair Bots
van Tonder, R., & Goues, C. L. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Bots in Software Engineering (BotSE) · doi:10.1109/botse.2019.00019 · Cited by 27
Monteiro, F. R., Gadelha, M. R., & Cordeiro, L. C. (2021) · Software Testing Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.1793 · Cited by 27
Concurrent incorrectness separation logic
Raad, A., Berdine, J., Dreyer, D. R., & O’Hearn, P. W. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3498695 · Cited by 25
Jiang, Z., Gan, S., Herrera, A., Toffalini, F., Romerio, L., Tang, C., Egele, M., Zhang, C., & Payer, M. (2022) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/3548606.3560575 · Cited by 25
Katana : Dual Slicing Based Context for Learning Bug Fixes
Sintaha, M., Nashid, N., & Mesbah, A. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3579640 · Cited by 24
Sorald: Automatic Patch Suggestions for SonarQube Static Analysis Violations
Etemadi, K., Harrand, N., Larsén, S., Adzemovic, H., Phu, H. L., Verma, A., Madeiral, F., Wikström, D., & Monperrus, M. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3167316 · Cited by 23
Rathore, S. S., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02346-x · Cited by 23
Mithra: Anomaly Detection as an Oracle for Cyberphysical Systems
Afzal, A., Goues, C. L., & Timperley, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2021.3120680 · Cited by 20
Sys: A {Static/Symbolic} Tool for Finding Good Bugs in Good (Browser) Code
Brown, F., Stefan, D., & Engler, D. (2020) · USENIX Security Symposium · Cited by 22
Characterizing the evolution of statically-detectable performance issues of Android apps
Das, T., Penta, M. D., & Malavolta, I. (2020) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-019-09798-3 · Cited by 22
Rahman, A., & Parnin, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3265962 · Cited by 21
A Precise and Expressive Lattice-theoretical Framework for Efficient Network Verification
Horn, A., Kheradmand, A., & Prasad, M. R. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) · doi:10.1109/icnp.2019.8888144 · Cited by 20
How to Find Actionable Static Analysis Warnings: A Case Study With FindBugs
Yedida, R., Kang, H. J., Tu, H., Yang, X., Lo, D., & Menzies, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2023.3234206 · Cited by 27
Style-Analyzer: Fixing Code Style Inconsistencies with Interpretable Unsupervised Algorithms
Markovtsev, V., Long, W., Mougard, H., Slavnov, K., & Bulychev, E. (2019) · International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) · doi:10.1109/msr.2019.00073 · Cited by 20
Codebase-adaptive detection of security-relevant methods
Piskachev, G., Quang, L. N., & Bodden, E. (2019) · ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA) · doi:10.1145/3293882.3330556 · Cited by 20
Demanded abstract interpretation
Stein, B., Chang, B.-Y. E., & Sridharan, M. (2021) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/3453483.3454044 · Cited by 19
Utture, A., Liu, S., Kalhauge, C. G., & Palsberg, J. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510166 · Cited by 19
Can GPT-4 Replicate Empirical Software Engineering Research?
Liang, J. T., Badea, C., Bird, C., DeLine, R., Ford, D., Forsgren, N., & Zimmermann, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3660767 · Cited by 19
Conquering the extensional scalability problem for value-flow analysis frameworks
Shi, Q., Wu, R., Fan, G., & Zhang, C. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3377811.3380346 · Cited by 19
Demanded Abstract Interpretation
Stein, B. (2022) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) · Cited by 19
Leveraging Practitioners’ Feedback to Improve a Security Linter
Reis, S., Abreu, R., d’Amorim, M., & Fortunato, D. (2022) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3551349.3560419 · Cited by 18
Gu, R., Zuo, Z., Jiang, X., Yin, H., Wang, Z., Wang, L., Li, X., & Huang, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2020.3036190 · Cited by 18
Zuo, Z., Zhang, Y., Pan, Q., Lu, S., Li, Y., Wang, L., Li, X., & Xu, G. H. (2021) · ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI) · doi:10.1145/3453483.3454085 · Cited by 18
A Critical Comparison on Six Static Analysis Tools: Detection Agreement and PrecisionPreprint
Lenarduzzi, V., Pecorelli, F., Saarimäki, N., Lujan, S., & Palomba, F. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4044439 · Cited by 18
AutoLog: A Log Sequence Synthesis Framework for Anomaly Detection
Huo, Y., Li, Y., Su, Y., He, P., Xie, Z., & Lyu, M. R.-T. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00133 · Cited by 22
Statfier: Automated Testing of Static Analyzers via Semantic-Preserving Program Transformations
Zhang, H., Pei, Y., Chen, J., & Tan, S. H. (2023) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616272 · Cited by 17
Evaluating Source Code Quality with Large Language Models: a comparative study
Simões, I. R. D. S., & Venson, E. (2024) · Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality (SBQS) · doi:10.1145/3701625.3701650 · Cited by 16
Goshawk: Hunting Memory Corruptions via Structure-Aware and Object-Centric Memory Operation Synopsis
Lyu, Y., Fang, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Q., Ma, S., Bertino, E., Lu, K., & Li, J. (2022) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp46214.2022.9833613 · Cited by 18
Can static analysis tools find more defects?
Mehrpour, S., & LaToza, T. D. (2022) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-022-10232-4 · Cited by 14
AlOmar, E. A., AlOmar, S. A., & Mkaouer, M. W. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET) · doi:10.1109/icse-seet58685.2023.00023 · Cited by 14
BigSpa: An Efficient Interprocedural Static Analysis Engine in the Cloud
Zuo, Z., Gu, R., Jiang, X., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., Wang, L., & Li, X. (2019) · IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2019.00086 · Cited by 14
Directed Dynamic Symbolic Execution for Static Analysis Warnings Confirmation
Gerasimov, A. Y. (2018) · Programming and Computer Software · doi:10.1134/s036176881805002x · Cited by 14
Machine-learning supported vulnerability detection in source code
Sonnekalb, T. (2019) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3338906.3341466 · Cited by 14
Certifying Decision Trees Against Evasion Attacks by Program Analysis
Calzavara, S., Ferrara, P., & Lucchese, C. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59013-0_21 · Cited by 14
Examining the Relationship of Code and Architectural Smells with Software Vulnerabilities
Sultana, K. Z., Codabux, Z., & Williams, B. J. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) · doi:10.1109/apsec51365.2020.00011 · Cited by 14
Find bugs in static bug finders
Wang, J., Huang, Y., Wang, S., & Wang, Q. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC) · doi:10.1145/3524610.3527899 · Cited by 13
Usability-Oriented Design of Liquid Types for Java
Gamboa, C., Canelas, P., Timperley, C. S., & Fonseca, A. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00132 · Cited by 13
Understanding the Impact of APIs Behavioral Breaking Changes on Client Applications
Jayasuriya, D., Terragni, V., Dietrich, J. B., & Blincoe, K. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3643782 · Cited by 13
Enabling continuous integration in a formal methods setting
Couto, L. D., Tran-Jørgensen, P. W. V., Nilsson, R. S., & Larsen, P. G. (2019) · International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10009-019-00546-y · Cited by 12
Same File, Different Changes: The Potential of Meta-Maintenance on GitHub
Hata, H., Kula, R. G., Ishio, T., & Treude, C. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse43902.2021.00076 · Cited by 12
What happens in my code reviews? An investigation on automatically classifying review changes
Fregnan, E., Petrulio, F., Geronimo, L. D., & Bacchelli, A. (2022) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-021-10075-5 · Cited by 12
Predictive Monitoring against Pattern Regular Languages
Ang, Z., & Mathur, U. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3632915 · Cited by 12
Please fix this mutant: How do developers resolve mutants surfaced during code review?
Petrović, G., Ivanković, M., Fraser, G., & Just, R. (2023) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1109/icse-seip58684.2023.00019 · Cited by 11
Applying formal verification to microkernel IPC at meta
Carbonneaux, Q., Zilberstein, N., Klee, C., O’Hearn, P. W., & Nardelli, F. Z. (2022) · ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs (CPP) · doi:10.1145/3497775.3503681 · Cited by 11
Hippodrome : Data Race Repair Using Static Analysis Summaries
Costea, A., Tiwari, A., Chianasta, S., Kishore, R., Roychoudhury, A., & Sergey, I. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3546942 · Cited by 10
BigDataflow: A Distributed Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis Framework
Sun, Z., Xu, D., Zhang, Y., Qi, Y. F., Wang, Y., Zuo, Z., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Li, X., Lu, Q., et al. (2023) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616348 · Cited by 10
MLOps critical success factors - A systematic literature review
Mehmood, Y., Sabahat, N., & Ijaz, M. A. (2024) · VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.21015/vtse.v12i1.1747 · Cited by 12
Finding and Understanding Defects in Static Analyzers by Constructing Automated Oracles
He, W., Di, P., Ming, M., Zhang, C., Su, T., Li, S., & Sui, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3660781 · Cited by 10
Sound and Partially-Complete Static Analysis of Data-Races in GPU Programs
Liew, D., Cogumbreiro, T., & Lange, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3689797 · Cited by 19
Non-termination Proving at Scale
Raad, A., Vanegue, J., & O’Hearn, P. W. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3689720 · Cited by 10
Automated Code Review Comment Classification to Improve Modern Code Reviews
Ochodek, M., Staron, M., Meding, W., & Söder, O. (2022) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04115-0_3 · Cited by 10
The role of program analysis in security vulnerability detection: Then and now
Cifuentes, C., Gauthier, F., Hassanshahi, B., Krishnan, P., & McCall, D. (2023) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2023.103463 · Cited by 10
On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis
Dietrich, J. B., Rasheed, S., Jordan, A., & White, T. (2023) · ACM Workshop on Software Supply Chain Offensive Research and Ecosystem Defenses (SCORED) · doi:10.1145/3689944.3696165 · Cited by 10
Active Documentation: Helping Developers Follow Design Decisions
Mehrpour, S., LaToza, T. D., & Kindi, R. K. (2019) · IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vlhcc.2019.8818816 · Cited by 10
Benz, M., Kristensen, E. K., Luo, L., Borges, N. P., Bodden, E., & Zeller, A. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3377811.3380438 · Cited by 10
Systemizing Interprocedural Static Analysis of Large-scale Systems Code with Graspan
Zuo, Z., Wang, K., Hussain, A., Sani, A. A., Zhang, Y., Lu, S., Dou, W., Wang, L., Li, X., Wang, C., et al. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/3466820 · Cited by 10
Learning How to Listen: Automatically Finding Bug Patterns in Event-Driven JavaScript APIs
Arteca, E., Schäfer, M., & Tip, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2022.3147975 · Cited by 9
Mokhberi, A., & Beznosov, K. (2021) · European Symposium on Usable Security (EuroUSEC) · doi:10.1145/3481357.3481522 · Cited by 9
Steenhoek, B. J., Sivaraman, K., Gonzalez, R. S., Mohylevskyy, Y., Moghaddam, R. Z., & Le, W. (2025) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse55347.2025.00126 · Cited by 8
Tailoring programs for static analysis via program transformation
van Tonder, R., & Goues, C. L. (2020) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3377811.3380343 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadowski, C., Aftandilian, E., Eagle, A., Miller-Cushon, L., & Jaspan, C.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 58-66
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2784876765
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 32.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Keywords
- static analysis tools, developer adoption, developer experience, software quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review