Cited by 23Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsUsability and User Interface Design

RuleSelector: Selecting Conditional Action Rules from User Behavior Patterns

Srinivasan, Vijay, Koehler, Christian, Jin, Hongxia·2018·Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Abstract

Modern smartphones and ubiquitous computing systems collect a wealth of context data from users. Conditional action rules, as popularized by the IFTTT (If-This-Then-That) platform, are a popular way for users to automate frequently repeated tasks or receive smart reminders, due to the intelligibility and control that rules provide to users. A key drawback of IFTTT systems is that they place the burden of manually specifying action rules on the user. While multiple rule mining algorithms have been proposed in existing work to automatically discover action rules, they generate hundreds of action rules, and the problem of how to present a small subset of rules to smartphone users and allow them to interactively select action rules remains unsolved. In this work, we take the first step towards solving this problem by designing and implementing RuleSelector, the first interactive rule selection tool to allow smartphone users to browse, modify, and select action rules from a small set of summarized rules presented to the user. We propose novel rule selection metrics to address the needs of smartphone users, and analyze the performance of RuleSelector using data from 200 users. We also perform a qualitative user study in order to evaluate how users use the RuleSelector tool and perceive the selected rules, and present the insights gained and design recommendations for future rule selection systems. Our users rated the selected rules from useful to very useful, and an important findi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3191767

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learners might receive instructional content at an inappropriate time, such as late evening when tired or while commuting, which results in ineffective learning.

    “there is a fair possibility that they might receive it at an inappropriate time, say late evening when they are tired (Grundspenkis, Lavendels, Novitsky, & Sitikovs, 2006) or while commuting (Srinivasan, Koehler, & Jin, 2018), which in turn results in ineffective learning.”

    From When Do Learners Study? (2022) · cites this paper as Srinivasan, Koehler, & Jin, 2018

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 23

Authors
Srinivasan, V., Koehler, C., & Jin, H.
Affiliations
Samsung Research America, Mountain View, CA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
1-34
ISSN
2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794746402
Cited by
23
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
rule selection, IFTTT, rule discovery, context-aware computing, home automation, smart TV, user study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review