RuleSelector: Selecting Conditional Action Rules from User Behavior Patterns
Abstract
Modern smartphones and ubiquitous computing systems collect a wealth of context data from users. Conditional action rules, as popularized by the IFTTT (If-This-Then-That) platform, are a popular way for users to automate frequently repeated tasks or receive smart reminders, due to the intelligibility and control that rules provide to users. A key drawback of IFTTT systems is that they place the burden of manually specifying action rules on the user. While multiple rule mining algorithms have been proposed in existing work to automatically discover action rules, they generate hundreds of action rules, and the problem of how to present a small subset of rules to smartphone users and allow them to interactively select action rules remains unsolved. In this work, we take the first step towards solving this problem by designing and implementing RuleSelector, the first interactive rule selection tool to allow smartphone users to browse, modify, and select action rules from a small set of summarized rules presented to the user. We propose novel rule selection metrics to address the needs of smartphone users, and analyze the performance of RuleSelector using data from 200 users. We also perform a qualitative user study in order to evaluate how users use the RuleSelector tool and perceive the selected rules, and present the insights gained and design recommendations for future rule selection systems. Our users rated the selected rules from useful to very useful, and an important findi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learners might receive instructional content at an inappropriate time, such as late evening when tired or while commuting, which results in ineffective learning.
“there is a fair possibility that they might receive it at an inappropriate time, say late evening when they are tired (Grundspenkis, Lavendels, Novitsky, & Sitikovs, 2006) or while commuting (Srinivasan, Koehler, & Jin, 2018), which in turn results in ineffective learning.”
From When Do Learners Study? (2022) · cites this paper as Srinivasan, Koehler, & Jin, 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Srinivasan, V., Koehler, C., & Jin, H.
- Affiliations
- Samsung Research America, Mountain View, CA, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 2474-9567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794746402
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- rule selection, IFTTT, rule discovery, context-aware computing, home automation, smart TV, user study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review