The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Query processing in a system for distributed databases (SDD-1)
Abstract
This paper describes the techniques used to optimize relational queries in the SDD-1 distributed database system. Queries are submitted to SDD-1 in a high-level procedural language called Datalanguage. Optimization begins by translating each Datalanguage query into a relational calculus form called an envelope , which is essentially an aggregate-free QUEL query. This paper is primarily concerned with the optimization of envelopes. Envelopes are processed in two phases. The first phase executes relational operations at various sites of the distributed database in order to delimit a subset of the database that contains all data relevant to the envelope. This subset is called a reduction of the database. The second phase transmits the reduction to one designated site, and the query is executed locally at that site. The critical optimization problem is to perform the reduction phase efficiently. Success depends on designing a good repertoire of operators to use during this phase, and an effective algorithm for deciding which of these operators to use in processing a given envelope against a given database. The principal reduction operator that we employ is called a semijoin . In this paper we define the semijoin operator, explain why semijoin is an effective reduction operator, and present an algorithm that constructs a cost-effective program of semijoins, given an envelope and a database.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation
Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Juve, G., Rynge, M., Callaghan, S., Maechling, P. J., Mayani, R., Chen, W., Ferreira da Silva, R., Livny, M., et al. (2015) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2014.10.008 · Cited by 861
A comparison of join algorithms for log processing in MaPreduce
Blanas, S., Patel, J. M., Ercegovac, V., Rao, J., Shekita, E. J., & Tian, Y. (2010) · Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1807167.1807273 · Cited by 414
Low Latency Geo-distributed Data Analytics
Pu, Q., Ananthanarayanan, G., Bodik, P., Kandula, S., Akella, A., Bahl, P., & Stoica, I. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication · doi:10.1145/2785956.2787505 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernstein, P. A., Goodman, N., Wong, E., Reeve, C. L., & Rothnie, J. B.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 602-625
- ISSN
- 0362-5915 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-4644
- OpenAlex
- W2023195086
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Query processing in a system for distributed databases (SDD-1). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/319628.319650
- The paper
- Bernstein, P. A., Goodman, N., Wong, E., Reeve, C. L., & Rothnie, J. B. (1981). Query processing in a system for distributed databases (SDD-1). ACM Transactions on Database Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/319628.319650
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.