Cited by 4Innovative Human-Technology InteractionInteractive and Immersive DisplaysUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unlocking the Interactive Office: Concurrent Prototyping Approach

Jaskiewicz, Tomasz, van der Helm, Aadjan·2018·Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Abstract

In this pictorial we present a project case, where an interactive office environment was designed following concurrent prototyping embedded in an iterative design approach. The case illustrates how concurrent prototyping supports designing complex interactions between multiple people and multiple interactive objects, while innovating in both social and technological realm. Identified variables of the involved process allow steering the design towards a variety of possible solution qualities. We propose this approach as a viable strategy for dealing with the complexity of designing in the domain of Human-Building Interaction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3196709.3196821

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jaskiewicz et al. found that while longer iterations promote focusing on certain aspects, multiple short iterations can lead to a more diverse but superficial set of solution options.

    “Jaskiewicz et al. found that while longer iterations promote focusing on certain aspects, multiple short iterations can lead to a more diverse but superficial set of solution options (Jaskiewicz and Helm 2018).”

    From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Jaskiewicz and Helm 2018

  • Within one iteration, several concurrent solution paths can be pursued in parallel, which can stimulate innovation and avoid imposing unnecessary limitations, but also cause contradictions between prototypes and complicate decision making.

    “Within one iteration, several concurrent solution paths can be pursued in parallel, which can stimulate innovation (Dow et al. 2011) and avoid imposing unnecessary limitations (Budde and Zullighoven 1990), but also cause contradictions between prototypes and complicate decision making (Jaskiewicz and Helm 2018).”

    From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Jaskiewicz and Helm 2018

  • Previous research identifies a connection between the length of an iteration and the number and quality of solution options, or requirement possibilities, that are obtained.

    “We note that previous research identifies a connection between the length of an iteration and the number and quality of solution options, or requirement possibilities, that are obtained (Jaskiewicz and Helm 2018).”

    From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Jaskiewicz and Helm 2018

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1145/2851581.2856502 · DOI
  2. Been Iris De, 2015, 14th EuroFM Research Symposium Proceedings. (pp. 1--10)
  3. Bill Buxton. 2010. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann. Bill Buxton. 2010. Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann.
  4. Chi Tom, 2013, Published on
  5. Jaskiewicz Tomasz, Management and Analysis of Design Studio Processes. In DS 88: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE17)
  6. Kees Dorst. 2015. Frame innovation. Kees Dorst. 2015. Frame innovation. · DOI
  7. Dow Steven P., Design Thinking Research (pp. 127--153)
  8. Alessandr Gandini 2015. The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. ephemera 15(1) p.193. Alessandr Gandini 2015. The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. ephemera 15(1) p.193.
  9. 10.1109/MPRV.2008.54 · DOI
  10. Hribernik Karl A., 2011, Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), 2011 17th International Conference on (pp. 1--9). IEEE.
  11. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00301.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jaskiewicz, T., & van der Helm, A.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-06-08
Pages
547-558
OpenAlex
W2808622727
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Designing Interactive Systems Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
iterative design, human-building interaction, multi-user interaction, design complexity, social innovation, technological innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review