The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An authorization mechanism for a relational database system
Open accessAbstract
A multiuser database system must selectively permit users to share data, while retaining the ability to restrict data access. There must be a mechanism to provide protection and security, permitting information to be accessed only by properly authorized users. Further, when tables or restricted views of tables are created and destroyed dynamically, the granting, authentication, and revocation of authorization to use them must also be dynamic. Each of these issues and their solutions in the context of the relational database management system System R are discussed. When a database user creates a table, he is fully and solely authorized to perform upon it actions such as read, insert, update, and delete. He may explicitly grant to any other user any or all of his privileges on the table. In addition he may specify that that user is authorized to further grant these privileges to still other users. The result is a directed graph of granted privileges originating from the table creator. At some later time a user A may revoke some or all of the privileges which he previously granted to another user B. This action usually revokes the entire subgraph of the grants originating from A's grant to B. It may be, however, that B will still possess the revoked privileges by means of a grant from another user C, and therefore some or all of B's grants should not be revoked. This problem is discussed in detail, and an algorithm for detecting exactly which of B's grants should be revoked is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
Codd, E. F. (1970) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/362384.362685 · Cited by 5,547
Cited by
Relational database: a practical foundation for productivity
Codd, E. F. (1982) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358396.358400 · Cited by 351
Revocations - A classification
Hagstrom, A., Jajodia, S., Parisi-Presicce, F., & Wijesekera, D. (2001) · Proceedings. 14th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, 2001. · doi:10.1109/csfw.2001.930135 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, P. P., & Wade, B. W.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Database Systems
- Published
- 1976-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-255
- ISSN
- 0362-5915 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-4644
- OpenAlex
- W2101465039
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An authorization mechanism for a relational database system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/320473.320482
- The paper
- Griffiths, P. P., & Wade, B. W. (1976). An authorization mechanism for a relational database system. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/320473.320482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.