Cited by 128E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

Digital government transformation: a case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation

Open access
Lindgren, Ida, van Veenstra, Anne Fleur·2018·Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age

Abstract

Digital government is often seen as an enabler or even driver of transformation of public administration, with the objective of creating public value. Such transformations are complex, requiring a long process of change; often, digitalization of public services is seen as the main means to this end. We investigate how digitalization of public services can be related to public sector transformation, and how this development can be linked to public value. In order to do so, this paper first conceptualizes digital government enabled transformation based on literature. Thereafter, we present an empirical example of public e-service development in Sweden. This case illustrates how e-service development can highlight shifts in societal values, and challenges that follow when trying to sustain changing societal values. Our findings suggest that in order to sustain transformation and (changing) public value, multiple processes of change and redesign need to be in place, not only of the organisational processes involved, but also of regulatory and institutional aspects, such as changes to the law and in the discretion and work practice of public officials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3209281.3209302

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • TNO Strategy and Policy, Den Haag, The Netherlands
Venue
Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-05-30
Pages
1-6
ISSN
3050-8681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807065935
Cited by
128
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
81.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
e-government, public administration transformation, public value, digital public services, online services, social values, change management, regulatory change, institutional change, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review