Digital government transformation: a case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation
Open accessAbstract
Digital government is often seen as an enabler or even driver of transformation of public administration, with the objective of creating public value. Such transformations are complex, requiring a long process of change; often, digitalization of public services is seen as the main means to this end. We investigate how digitalization of public services can be related to public sector transformation, and how this development can be linked to public value. In order to do so, this paper first conceptualizes digital government enabled transformation based on literature. Thereafter, we present an empirical example of public e-service development in Sweden. This case illustrates how e-service development can highlight shifts in societal values, and challenges that follow when trying to sustain changing societal values. Our findings suggest that in order to sustain transformation and (changing) public value, multiple processes of change and redesign need to be in place, not only of the organisational processes involved, but also of regulatory and institutional aspects, such as changes to the law and in the discretion and work practice of public officials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sometimes rule bending goes so far that the current regular practice differs from legal provisions and consequently cannot be digitalised; for instance, paternity registration of same sex parents in Sweden.
“Sometimes, rule bending goes so far that the current regular practice differ from legal provisions and consequently, cannot be digitalised; for instance, paternity registration of same sex parents in Sweden (Lindgren & van Veenstra, 2018).”
From Does digital government hollow out the essence of street‐level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools' foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street‐level decision‐making (2024) · cites this paper as Lindgren & van Veenstra, 2018
Cites
New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance
Dunleavy, P. (2005) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057 · Cited by 2,638 · cited 3× · see citing works
“In the general discourse on digitalization in the public sector, digital government is considered to be a facilitator or even a driver of transformation [3, 7, 10, 32].”
BackgroundE-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited?
Nograšek, J., & Vintar, M. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.006 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Literacy: A Review of Literature
Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020) · International Journal of Technoethics · doi:10.4018/ijt.20200701.oa1 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Marienfeldt, J. (2024) · Social Policy & Administration · doi:10.1111/spol.12991 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The process of solving problems with self-service technologies: a study from the user’s perspective
Nili, A., Tate, M., & Johnstone, D. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-018-9304-0 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- TNO Strategy and Policy, Den Haag, The Netherlands
- ORCID
- Lindgren, Ida
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-05-30
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 3050-8681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807065935
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 81.11
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (publishedVersion)
- DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- e-government, public administration transformation, public value, digital public services, online services, social values, change management, regulatory change, institutional change, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review