Cited by 34ICT in Developing CommunitiesEducation in Rural ContextsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Designing Appropriate Learning Technologies for School vs Home Settings in Tanzanian Rural Villages

Uchidiuno, Judith, Yarzebinski, Evelyn, Madaio, Michael, Maheshwari, Nupur, Koedinger, Ken, Ogan, Amy·2018·Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies

Abstract

Smartphone- and tablet-based learning systems are often posited as solutions for closing early literacy gaps between rural and urban regions in emerging economies. These systems are often developed based on experiences with students in urban contexts, limiting their success rates with children from rural areas who have had little to no prior exposure to technology. To explore how such technologies are used in different learning contexts, we deployed an early literacy learning application in school and home settings in a rural village in Tanzania. We use Rogoff's theory of instructional models to understand and describe the interaction between learners, adults, and peers. We found that in the presence of a school teacher, the instructional model was primarily "adult-run" where information was almost entirely disseminated by the teacher, while in home settings, the instructional model was similar to a "community-of-learners" model where children collaborate with other peers and adults to achieve their learning goals. We use these instructional models to surface six themes of support and scaffolding that were expressed differently across settings, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of the instructional models observed in providing support across these themes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3209811.3209881

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AIEd systems have great potential to address inequities in education, for example by filling gaps in the educational services otherwise available to learners.

    “AIEd systems have great potential to address inequities in education, for example by filling gaps in the educational services otherwise available to learners (Madaio et al., 2020; Saxena et al., 2018; Uchidiuno et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uchidiuno, J., Yarzebinski, E., Madaio, M., Maheshwari, N., Koedinger, K., & Ogan, A.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-06-20
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W2808887932
Cited by
34
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7
FWCI
3.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Jacobs Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
early literacy, mobile learning, rural education, community of learners, peer collaboration, scaffolding, Tanzania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review