Cited by 378Recommender Systems and TechniquesSpeech and dialogue systemsAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conversational Recommender System

Open access
Sun, Yueming, Zhang, Yi·2018·The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval

Abstract

A personalized conversational sales agent could have much commercial potential. E-commerce companies such as Amazon, eBay, JD, Alibaba etc. are piloting such kind of agents with their users. However, the research on this topic is very limited and existing solutions are either based on single round adhoc search engine or traditional multi round dialog system. They usually only utilize user inputs in the current session, ignoring users' long term preferences. On the other hand, it is well known that sales conversion rate can be greatly improved based on recommender systems, which learn user preferences based on past purchasing behavior and optimize business oriented metrics such as conversion rate or expected revenue. In this work, we propose to integrate research in dialog systems and recommender systems into a novel and unified deep reinforcement learning framework to build a personalized conversational recommendation agent that optimizes a per session based utility function. In particular, we propose to represent a user conversation history as a semi-structured user query with facet-value pairs. This query is generated and updated by belief tracker that analyzes natural language utterances of user at each step. We propose a set of machine actions tailored for recommendation agents and train a deep policy network to decide which action (i.e. asking for the value of a facet or making a recommendation) the agent should take at each step. We train a personalized recommendation model that uses both the user's past ratings and user query collected in the current conversational session when making rating predictions and generating recommendations. Such a conversational system often tries to collect user preferences by asking questions. Once enough user preference is collected, it makes personalized recommendations to the user. We perform both simulation experiments and real online user studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3209978.3210002

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bordes Antoine, 2016, Learning end-to-end goal-oriented dialog. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07683 · arXiv
  2. Li Jiwei, 2015, A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.03055 · arXiv
  3. Lops Pasquale, 2011, Marco De Gemmis, and Giovanni Semeraro
  4. Narasimhan Karthik, 2016, Improving information extraction by acquiring external evidence with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.07954 · arXiv
  5. Nogueira Rodrigo, 2017, Task-oriented query reformulation with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04572 · arXiv
  6. 10.5555/1046920.1088715 · DOI
  7. Silver David, 2016, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et almbox. .
  8. Silver David, 2017, et almbox
  9. Vinyals Oriol, 2015, A neural conversational model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05869 · arXiv
  10. Wen Tsung-Hsien, 2016, A network-based end-to-end trainable task-oriented dialogue system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.04562 · arXiv
  11. Williams Jason, 2013, Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2013 Conference. 404--413
  12. Zhao Tiancheng, 2016, Towards end-to-end learning for dialog state tracking and management using deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02560 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-06-27
Pages
235-244
OpenAlex
W2964112275
Cited by
378
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 2
FWCI
28.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
conversational recommender systems, personalized recommendation, deep reinforcement learning, dialogue systems, salespeople, e-commerce, long-term user preferences, belief tracking, rating prediction, conversion optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review