The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical Theorem-Proving by Model Elimination
Open accessAbstract
A proof procedure based on a theorem of Herbrand and utilizing the matching technique of Prawitz is presented. In general, Herbrand-type proof procedures proceed by generating over increasing numbers of candidates for the truth-functionally contradictory statement the procedures seek. A trial is successful when some candidate is in fact a contradictory statement. In procedures to date the number of candidates developed before a contradictory statement is found (if one is found) varies roughly exponentially with the size of the contradictory statement. (“Size” might be measured by the number of clauses in the conjunctive normal form of the contradictory statement.) Although basically subject to the same rate of growth, the procedure introduced here attempts to drastically trim the number of candidates at an intermediate level of development. This is done by retaining beyond a certain level only candidates already “partially contradictory.” The major task usually is finding the partially contradictory sets. However, the number of candidate sets required to find these subsets of the contradictory set is generally much smaller than the number required to find the full contradictory set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On indefinite databases and the closed world assumption
Minker, J. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0000066 · Cited by 381
The early years of logic programming
Kowalski, R. A. (1988) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/35043.35046 · Cited by 176
History of Interactive Theorem Proving
Harrison, J., Urban, J., & Wiedijk, F. (2014) · Handbook of the History of Logic · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51624-4.50004-6 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Loveland, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1968-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-251
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2005090804
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical Theorem-Proving by Model Elimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/321450.321456
- The paper
- Loveland, D. W. (1968). Mechanical Theorem-Proving by Model Elimination. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/321450.321456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.