The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Efficient Algorithm for Graph Isomorphism
Open accessAbstract
A procedure for determining whether two graphs are isomorphic is described.During the procedure, from any given graph two graphs, the representative graph and the reordered graph, are derived.The representative graph is a homomorphic image of the original graph; the reordered graph is constructed from the representative graph to be isomorphic to the given graph.Unique labels are assigned to the vertices of both derived graphs.It follows that two representative graphs or two reordered graphs are isomorphic if and only if they are identical.A conjecture states that the representative graphs exhibit the automorphism partitioning of the given graph.The representative graphs form a necessity condition for isomorphism; namely, if the representative graphs are not identical, then the given graphs are not isomorphic.The converse is true for trees and follows from the conjecture for other types of graphs.It is also shown that the reordered graphs form a sufficiency condition for isomorphism; namely, if the reordered graphs are identical, then the given graphs are isomorphic.The converse follows from the conjecture.The time required to determine both derived graphs depends on a power of n, the order of the given graph.This power is a function of an adjacency property known as the strong regularity of the given graph.For graphs that do not contain a strongly regular transitive subgraph, the power is, at worst, five.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
Cook, S. A. (1971) · Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '71 · doi:10.1145/800157.805047 · Cited by 6,385
Metadata
- Authors
- Corneil, D. G., & Gotlieb, C. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1970-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-64
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2154878346
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Efficient Algorithm for Graph Isomorphism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/321556.321562
- The paper
- Corneil, D. G., & Gotlieb, C. C. (1970). An Efficient Algorithm for Graph Isomorphism. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/321556.321562
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.