Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,081

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient Planarity Testing

Open access
Hopcroft, John, Tarjan, Robert·1974·Journal of the ACM

Abstract

This paper describes an efficient algorithm to determine whether an arbitrary graph G can be embedded in the plane. The algorithm may be viewed as an iterative version of a method originally proposed by Auslander and Parter and correctly formulated by Goldstein. The algorithm used depth-first search and has O ( V ) time and space bounds, where V is the number of vertices in G . An ALGOL implementation of the algorithm succesfully tested graphs with as many as 900 vertices in less than 12 seconds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/321850.321852

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 1,081

Metadata

Authors
Hopcroft, J., & Tarjan, R.
Venue
Journal of the ACM
Published
1974-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
549-568
ISSN
  • 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-735X
OpenAlex
W1987374783
Cited by
1,081
References
14
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient Planarity Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/321850.321852
The paper
Hopcroft, J., & Tarjan, R. (1974). Efficient Planarity Testing. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/321850.321852

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.