The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
STAMP: Short-Term Attention/Memory Priority Model for Session-based Recommendation
Abstract
Predicting users' actions based on anonymous sessions is a challenging problem in web-based behavioral modeling research, mainly due to the uncertainty of user behavior and the limited information. Recent advances in recurrent neural networks have led to promising approaches to solving this problem, with long short-term memory model proving effective in capturing users' general interests from previous clicks. However, none of the existing approaches explicitly take the effects of users' current actions on their next moves into account. In this study, we argue that a long-term memory model may be insufficient for modeling long sessions that usually contain user interests drift caused by unintended clicks. A novel short-term attention/memory priority model is proposed as a remedy, which is capable of capturing users' general interests from the long-term memory of a session context, whilst taking into account users' current interests from the short-term memory of the last-clicks. The validity and efficacy of the proposed attention mechanism is extensively evaluated on three benchmark data sets from the RecSys Challenge 2015 and CIKM Cup 2016. The numerical results show that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance in all the tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Cited by
BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer
Sun, F., Liu, J., Wu, J., Pei, C., Lin, X., Ou, W., & Jiang, P. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3357895 · Cited by 2,558
RecBole: Towards a Unified, Comprehensive and Efficient Framework for Recommendation Algorithms
Zhao, W. X., Mu, S., Hou, Y., Lin, Z., Chen, Y., Pan, X., Li, K., Lu, Y., Wang, H., Tian, C., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482016 · Cited by 455
A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Graph Representation Learning
Ju, W., Fang, Z., Gu, Y., Liu, Z., Long, Q., Qiao, Z., Qin, Y., Shen, J., Sun, F., Xiao, Z., et al. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106207 · Cited by 341
Rethinking the Item Order in Session-based Recommendation with Graph Neural Networks
Qiu, R., Li, J., Huang, Z., & YIn, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3357384.3358010 · Cited by 339
Evaluation of session-based recommendation algorithms
Ludewig, M., & Jannach, D. (2018) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-018-9209-6 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Q., Zeng, Y., Mokhosi, R., & Zhang, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-07-19
- Pages
- 1831-1839
- OpenAlex
- W2809307135
- Cited by
- 960
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.01
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STAMP: Short-Term Attention/Memory Priority Model for Session-based Recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3219819.3219950
- The paper
- Liu, Q., Zeng, Y., Mokhosi, R., & Zhang, H. (2018). STAMP: Short-Term Attention/Memory Priority Model for Session-based Recommendation. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219950
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.