Cited by 180Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Deep Adversarial Learning for Multi-Modality Missing Data Completion

Cai, Lei, Wang, Zhengyang, Gao, Hongyang, Shen, Dinggang, Ji, Shuiwang·2018·Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining

Abstract

Multi-modality data are widely used in clinical applications, such as tumor detection and brain disease diagnosis. Different modalities can usually provide complementary information, which commonly leads to improved performance. However, some modalities are commonly missing for some subjects due to various technical and practical reasons. As a result, multi-modality data are usually incomplete, raising the multi-modality missing data completion problem. In this work, we formulate the problem as a conditional image generation task and propose an encoder-decoder deep neural network to tackle this problem. Specifically, the model takes the existing modality as input and generates the missing modality. By employing an auxiliary adversarial loss, our model is able to generate high-quality missing modality images. At the same time, we propose to incorporate the available category information of subjects in training to enable the model to generate more informative images. We evaluate our method on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative~(ADNI) database, where positron emission tomography~(PET) modalities are missing. Experimental results show that the trained network can generate high-quality PET modalities based on existing magnetic resonance imaging~(MRI) modalities, and provide complementary information to improve the detection and tracking of the Alzheimer's disease. Our results also show that the proposed methods generate higher quality images than baseline methods as m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3219819.3219963

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing multimodal fusion models trained on full-modality samples usually fail when partial modalities are missing.

    “Existing multimodal fusion models trained on full-modality samples usually fail when partial modalities are missing (Aguilar et al., 2019; Pham et al., 2019; Cai et al., 2018; Parthasarathy and Sundaram, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, L., Wang, Z., Gao, H., Shen, D., & Ji, S.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-07-19
Pages
1158-1166
OpenAlex
W2809410879
Cited by
180
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9
FWCI
2.75
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-17-2-4031)
  • National Science Foundation (DBI-1641223, IIS-1615035, IIS-1633359)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
conditional image generation, adversarial loss, encoder-decoder neural network, Alzheimer's disease, ADNI, multimodal medical imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review