Cited by 179Advanced Graph Neural NetworksComplex Network Analysis TechniquesGraph Theory and Algorithms

Deep Recursive Network Embedding with Regular Equivalence

Tu, Ke, Cui, Peng, Wang, Xiao, Yu, Philip S., Zhu, Wenwu·2018·Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining

Abstract

Network embedding aims to preserve vertex similarity in an embedding space. Existing approaches usually define the similarity by direct links or common neighborhoods between nodes, i.e. structural equivalence. However, vertexes which reside in different parts of the network may have similar roles or positions, i.e. regular equivalence, which is largely ignored by the literature of network embedding. Regular equivalence is defined in a recursive way that two regularly equivalent vertexes have network neighbors which are also regularly equivalent. Accordingly, we propose a new approach named Deep Recursive Network Embedding (DRNE) to learn network embeddings with regular equivalence. More specifically, we propose a layer normalized LSTM to represent each node by aggregating the representations of their neighborhoods in a recursive way. We theoretically prove that some popular and typical centrality measures which are consistent with regular equivalence are optimal solutions of our model. This is also demonstrated by empirical results that the learned node representations can well predict the indexes of regular equivalence and related centrality scores. Furthermore, the learned node representations can be directly used for end applications like structural role classification in networks, and the experimental results show that our method can consistently outperform centrality-based methods and other state-of-the-art network embedding methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3219819.3220068

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DRNE assumes a node's network embedding should approximate the aggregation of its neighborhood network embeddings.

    “Deep Recursive Network Embedding (DRNE) [63] assumes a node's network embedding should approximate the aggregation of its neighborhood network embeddings.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks (2021) · cites this paper as [63]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 179

Authors
Tu, K., Cui, P., Wang, X., Yu, P. S., & Zhu, W.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-07-19
Pages
2357-2366
OpenAlex
W2808867307
Cited by
179
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
Keywords
graph embedding, regular equivalence, structural equivalence, LSTM, layer normalization, network centrality, node representation learning, neighborhood aggregation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review