Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Local Feedback in Full-Text Retrieval Systems

Open access
Attar, R., Fraenkel, A. S.·1977·Journal of the ACM

Abstract

AaSTRACT.In a full-text natural-language retrieval system, local feedbacl~ is the process of formulating a new ~mproved search based on clustering terms from the documents returned m a previous search of any given query Experiments were run on a database of US patents It ~s concluded that m contrast toglobalclustermg, where the size of matrices hmmts apphcatmns to small databases and improvements are doubtful, local clustering is practical also for large databases and appears to improve overall performance, especially tf metrical constraints and weighting by proximity are embedded m the local feedback The local methods adapt themselves to each mdwtdual search and produce useful searchonymsterms which are "synonymous" m the context of one query Searchonyms lead to new ~mproved search formulahons both via manual and vm automahc feedback

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/322017.322021

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Attar, R., & Fraenkel, A. S.
Venue
Journal of the ACM
Published
1977-07
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
397-417
ISSN
  • 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-735X
OpenAlex
W1992113527
Cited by
230
References
0
FWCI
16.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Feedback in Full-Text Retrieval Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/322017.322021
The paper
Attar, R., & Fraenkel, A. S. (1977). Local Feedback in Full-Text Retrieval Systems. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/322017.322021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.