The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal sequence learning and data reduction for anomaly detection
Abstract
The anomaly-detection problem can be formulated as one of learning to characterize the behaviors of an individual, system, or network in terms of temporal sequences of discrete data. We present an approach on the basis of instance-based learning (IBL) techniques. To cast the anomaly-detection task in an IBL framework, we employ an approach that transforms temporal sequences of discrete, unordered observations into a metric space via a similarity measure that encodes intra-attribute dependencies. Classification boundaries are selected from an a posteriori characterization of valid user behaviors, coupled with a domain heuristic. An empirical evaluation of the approach on user command data demonstrates that we can accurately differentiate the profiled user from alternative users when the available features encode sufficient information. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the system detects anomalous conditions quickly — an important quality for reducing potential damage by a malicious user. We present several techniques for reducing data storage requirements of the user profile, including instance-selection methods and clustering. As empirical evaluation shows that a new greedy clustering algorithm reduces the size of the user model by 70%, with only a small loss in accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Cited by
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Mimicry attacks on host-based intrusion detection systems
Wagner, D., & Soto, P. (2002) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/586110.586145 · Cited by 714
Discrete Wavelet transform-based time series analysis and mining
Chaovalit, P., Gangopadhyay, A., Karabatis, G., & Chen, Z. (2011) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1883612.1883613 · Cited by 218
Honeypot: a supplemented active defense system for network security
Zhang, F., Zhou, S., Qin, Z., & Liu, J. (2004) · Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Post-graduates and Young Scientists. Modern Technique and Technologies. MTT'2002 (Cat. No.02EX550) · doi:10.1109/pdcat.2003.1236295 · Cited by 85
Challenges and opportunities in applied machine learning
Brodley, C. E., Rebbapragada, U., Small, K., & Wallace, B. C. (2012) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v33i1.2367 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lane, T., & Brodley, C. E.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-331
- ISSN
- 1094-9224 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7406
- OpenAlex
- W2082600559
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal sequence learning and data reduction for anomaly detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/322510.322526
- The paper
- Lane, T., & Brodley, C. E. (1999). Temporal sequence learning and data reduction for anomaly detection. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/322510.322526
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.