Deep Recurrent Multi-instance Learning with Spatio-temporal Features for Engagement Intensity Prediction
Abstract
This paper elaborates the winner approach for engagement intensity prediction in the EmotiW Challenge 2018. The task is to predict the engagement level of a subject when he or she is watching an educational video in diverse conditions and different environments. Our approach formulates the prediction task as a multi-instance regression problem. We divide an input video sequence into segments and calculate the temporal and spatial features of each segment for regressing the intensity. Subject engagement, that is intuitively related with body and face changes in time domain, can be characterized by long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Hence, we build a multi-modal regression model based on multi-instance mechanism as well as LSTM. To make full use of training and validation data, we train different models for different data split and conduct model ensemble finally. Experimental results show that our method achieves mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0717 in the validation set, which improves the baseline results by 28%. Our methods finally win the challenge with MSE of 0.0626 on the testing set.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple-instance configurations risk losing critical information when information from instances is fused.
“the risk of losing critical information when the information obtained from these instances is fused [20,21]”
From TVGeAN: Tensor Visibility Graph-Enhanced Attention Network for Versatile Multivariant Time Series Learning Tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In definition, it consists of Behavioral Engagement, Emotional Engagement, Cognitive Engagement and Agentic Engagement [7].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Suppressing Uncertainties for Large-Scale Facial Expression Recognition
Wang, K., Peng, X., Yang, J., Lu, S., & Qiao, Y. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00693 · Cited by 772 · see citing works
Self-citationA Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches to Educational Data Mining
Hernández-Blanco, A., Herrera-Flores, B., Tomás, D., & Navarro-Colorado, B. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/1306039 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Mehta, N. K., Prasad, S. S., Saurav, S., Saini, R., & Singh, S. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03200-4 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Baz, M. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12213320 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, J., Wang, K., Peng, X., & Qiao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-10-02
- Pages
- 594-598
- OpenAlex
- W2895475421
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Shenzhen Basic Research Program (JCYJ20150925163005055, JCYJ20170818164704758)
- International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (172644KYSB20160033, 172644KYSB20150019)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1613211, 61502152)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- deep recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory, spatio-temporal features, video segmentation, ensemble learning, user engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review