Gait-based Person Re-identification: A Survey
Abstract
The way people walk is a strong correlate of their identity. Several studies have shown that both humans and machines can recognize individuals just by their gait, given that proper measurements of the observed motion patterns are available. For surveillance applications, gait is also attractive, because it does not require active collaboration from users and is hard to fake. However, the acquisition of good-quality measures of a person’s motion patterns in unconstrained environments, (e.g., in person re-identification applications) has proved very challenging in practice. Existing technology (video cameras) suffer from changes in viewpoint, daylight, clothing, accessories, and other variations in the person’s appearance. Novel three-dimensional sensors are bringing new promises to the field, but still many research issues are open. This article presents a survey of the work done in gait analysis for re-identification in the past decade, looking at the main approaches, datasets, and evaluation methodologies. We identify several relevant dimensions of the problem and provide a taxonomic analysis of the current state of the art. Finally, we discuss the levels of performance achievable with the current technology and give a perspective of the most challenging and promising directions of research for the future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the prior surveys focus on presenting the main advances regarding deep learning-based approaches for gait recognition.
“However, none of them focus on presenting the main advances regarding deep learning-based approaches for gait recognition.”
From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Nambiar, A., Bernardino, A., & Nascimento, J. C.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Superior Técnico (PT)
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2019-04-26
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2943554767
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- FCT projects (UID/EEA/50009/2013)
- FCT doctoral (SFRH/BD/97258/2013)
- AHA (CMUP-ERI/HCI/0046/2013)
- SPARSIS (PTDC/EEIPRO/0426/2014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- gait analysis, gait recognition, surveillance, gait dataset, evaluation methodology, viewpoint variation, unconstrained environments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review