The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full Sharding
Abstract
A major approach to overcoming the performance and scalability limitations of current blockchain protocols is to use sharding which is to split the overheads of processing transactions among multiple, smaller groups of nodes. These groups work in parallel to maximize performance while requiring significantly smaller communication, computation, and storage per node, allowing the system to scale to large networks. However, existing sharding-based blockchain protocols still require a linear amount of communication (in the number of participants) per transaction, and hence, attain only partially the potential benefits of sharding. We show that this introduces a major bottleneck to the throughput and latency of these protocols. Aside from the limited scalability, these protocols achieve weak security guarantees due to either a small fault resiliency (e.g., 1/8 and 1/4) or high failure probability, or they rely on strong assumptions (e.g., trusted setup) that limit their applicability to mainstream payment systems. We propose RapidChain, the first sharding-based public blockchain protocol that is resilient to Byzantine faults from up to a 1/3 fraction of its participants, and achieves complete sharding of the communication, computation, and storage overhead of processing transactions without assuming any trusted setup. RapidChain employs an optimal intra-committee consensus algorithm that can achieve very high throughputs via block pipelining, a novel gossiping protocol for large blocks, and a provably-secure reconfiguration mechanism to ensure robustness. Using an efficient cross-shard transaction verification technique, our protocol avoids gossiping transactions to the entire network. Our empirical evaluations suggest that RapidChain can process (and confirm) more than 7,300 tx/sec with an expected confirmation latency of roughly 8.7 seconds in a network of 4,000 nodes with an overwhelming time-to-failure of more than 4,500 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Polynomial Codes Over Certain Finite Fields
Reed, I. S., & Solomon, G. (1960) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0108018 · Cited by 3,662
Practical Byzantine fault tolerance
Castro, M., & Liskov, B. H. (1999) · Operating Systems Design and Implementation · doi:10.5555/296806.296824 · Cited by 3,205
Kademlia: A Peer-to-Peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric
Maymounkov, P., & Mazières, D. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_5 · Cited by 3,004
Lamport, L. (1998) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/279227.279229 · Cited by 2,737
Practical byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery
Castro, M., & Liskov, B. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/571637.571640 · Cited by 2,475
Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults
Pease, M., Shostak, R., & Lamport, L. (1980) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/322186.322188 · Cited by 2,359
Theory and practice of error control codes
Blahut, R. E. (1983) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 2,066
A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function
Merkle, R. C. (1988) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48184-2_32 · Cited by 1,998
Algorand: Scaling Byzantine Agreements for Cryptocurrencies
Gilad, Y., Hemo, R., Micali, S., Vlachos, G., & Zeldovich, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/3132747.3132757 · Cited by 1,499
Cited by
Blockchain for AI: review and open research challenges
Salah, K., Rehman, M. H. U., Nizamuddin, N., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2890507 · Cited by 1,001
Solutions to scalability of blockchain: a survey
Zhou, Q., Huang, H., Zheng, Z., & Bian, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2967218 · Cited by 689
$\mathsf{LightChain}$: A Lightweight Blockchain System for Industrial Internet of Things
Liu, Y., Wang, K., Lin, Y., & Xu, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2904049 · Cited by 286
Survey: sharding in blockchains
Yu, G., Wang, X., Yu, K., Ni, W., Zhang, J. A., & Liu, R. P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2965147 · Cited by 267
Tornado: Enabling Blockchain in Heterogeneous Internet of Things Through a Space-Structured Approach
Liu, Y., Wang, K., Qian, K., Du, M., & Guo, S. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2954128 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Zamani, M., Movahedi, M., & Raykova, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-10-15
- Pages
- 931-948
- OpenAlex
- W2897676665
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 66.97
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full Sharding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3243734.3243853
- The paper
- Zamani, M., Movahedi, M., & Raykova, M. (2018). RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full Sharding. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734.3243853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.