Cited by 31Electronic Health Records SystemsInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationMedical Coding and Health Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Data Work in Healthcare: Challenges for Patients, Clinicians and Administrators

Pine, Kathleen H., Bossen, Claus, Chen, Yunan, Ellingsen, Gunnar, Grisot, Miria, Mazmanian, Melissa, Møller, Naja Holten·2018·Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

Abstract

With the wide adoption of information infrastructures in healthcare (IIH), citizens and healthcare professionals now carry out intensive "data work' as part of their healthcare and self-management practices. For example, citizens use mobile apps to track personal health data for both formal and informal usages, clinicians rely on electronic health records (EHR) to document patient information, and hospital administrators use EHRs to generate data to monitor quality and efficiency of healthcare services. The creation, accumulation, management, and communication of data is increasingly central to patient work, clinical work, and management and governance of healthcare providers. To better understand data work in healthcare, this workshop aims to convene researchers from different disciplines to discuss data work performed among the entire ecosystem of clinical care delivery from patients to clinicians to administrators. Critical topics include but are not limited to: patient data work (both voluntary and compelled by clinicians as part of treatment); algorithmic authority of information infrastructure and effects on the exercise of expertise and discretion of healthcare professions; clinician demands for documentation (and balancing these demands with patient-centered care); new forms of healthcare data work, including new occupations and tasks; and data-driven accountability and management in healthcare.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3272973.3273017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1007/s10606-010-9130-y · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.004 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/2145204.2145341 · DOI
  4. Geoffrey Bowker . 2008. Memory Practices in the Sciences . Cambridge : The MIT Press . Geoffrey Bowker. 2008. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  5. Bente Christensen & Gunnar Ellingsen . 2014 . User-Controlled standardization of health care practices , Proc ECIS, Tel Aviv , 2014 Bente Christensen & Gunnar Ellingsen. 2014. User-Controlled standardization of health care practices, Proc ECIS, Tel Aviv, 2014
  6. 10.1007/s10606-010-9122-y · DOI
  7. Lisa Gitelman . 2013. Raw Data Is an Oxymoron . Boston : MIT Press . Lisa Gitelman. 2013. Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Boston: MIT Press.
  8. 10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Naja L. Møller & Signe Vikkelsø. 2012. The clinical work of secretaries: Exploring the intersection of administrative work and clinical work in the diagnosing process In Dugdale et al. (eds) From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems 33--47. Naja L. Møller & Signe Vikkelsø. 2012. The clinical work of secretaries: Exploring the intersection of administrative work and clinical work in the diagnosing process In Dugdale et al. (eds) From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems 33--47. · DOI
  10. 10.1145/2998181.2998296 · DOI
  11. 10.5555/3056035 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/2531602.2531652 · DOI
  13. 10.1145/2702123.2702298 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pine, K. H., Bossen, C., Chen, Y., Ellingsen, G., Grisot, M., Mazmanian, M., & Møller, N. H.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
  • Høyskolen Kristiania (NO)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-10-30
Pages
433-439
OpenAlex
W2899221473
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
data work, healthcare information infrastructure, electronic health records, patient self-management, mobile health apps, clinical documentation, algorithmic authority, patient-centered care, health care governance, health data management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review