The Internet's Hidden Rules: An Empirical Study of Reddit Norm Violations at Micro, Meso, and Macro Scales
Abstract
Norms are central to how online communities are governed. Yet, norms are also emergent, arise from interaction, and can vary significantly between communities---making them challenging to study at scale. In this paper, we study community norms on Reddit in a large-scale, empirical manner. Via 2.8M comments removed by moderators of 100 top subreddits over 10 months, we use both computational and qualitative methods to identify three types of norms: macro norms that are universal to most parts of Reddit; meso norms that are shared across certain groups of subreddits; and micro norms that are specific to individual, relatively unique subreddits. Given the size of Reddit's user base---and the wide range of topics covered by different subreddits---we argue this represents the first large-scale census of the norms in broader internet culture. In other words, these findings shed light on what Reddit values, and how widely-held those values are. We conclude by discussing implications for the design of new and existing online communities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A clear community consensus on unacceptable behaviors and their enforcement promotes mutual social learning and can reduce later tension and divisions in the event of a serious infringement.
“A clear community consensus on unacceptable behaviors and their enforcement promotes mutual social learning [6] and can reduce later tension and divisions in the event of a serious infringement.”
From Codes of Conduct in Open Source (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Subreddit designers must set the community goal and rules and decide implicit policies like target population and moderation strategies; these choices help shape social interactions in the community.
“They need to defne the community goal (e.g.,”
From Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systems (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
There exist diverse rules and preferences of austerity and value in different communities.
“there exist diverse rules and preferences of austerity and value in diferent communities [20,31,74,77]”
From Human-AI Collaboration via Conditional Delegation: A Case Study of Content Moderation (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 282
- Authors
- Chandrasekharan, E., Samory, M., Jhaver, S., Charvat, H., Bruckman, A., Lampe, C., Eisenstein, J., & Gilbert, E.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- CSCW
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899027170
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
- ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (IIS-1553376)
- National Institutes of Health (R01GM112697-01)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Keywords
- Reddit, subreddits, community governance, moderation, content removal, internet culture, online community design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review