Cited by 17Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAI in Service InteractionsSpeech and dialogue systems

Designing Out Stereotypes in Artificial Intelligence: Involving users in the personality design of a digital assistant

Spencer, Jak, Poggi, Juliette, Gheerawo, Rama·2018·Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good

Abstract

Rapid recent advancements in new technologies and artificial intelligence has led to huge developments in science, technology, medicine and engineering over the last few decades. Recently, developments in the field have tried to create machines that go beyond solving rational, logic based challenges to those that mimic human interaction and in particular emotional intelligence. One of the most mainstream applications of this technology is in digital assistants; tools designed to achieve a result using natural language.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3284869.3284897

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People-centred design research with a small number of diverse people resulted in the creation of a virtual assistant personality that moved away from the stereotypical young, Caucasian, secretarial woman to an older, wiser personality.

    “With virtual assistants for example, conducting people-centred design research with a small number of diverse people resulted in the creation of an assistant that moved away from the generic stereotypical young, Caucasian, secretarial woman to the development of an older, wiser personality such as David Attenborough or Judy Dench (Spencer et al, 2018).”
  • The vast majority of digital assistants are portrayed as young, Caucasian women, enhancing the negative perception of the stereotyped role of women in secretarial roles.

    “One recent study by researchers at the Helen Hamlyn Centre for Design (Spencer et al, 2018) found that the vast majority of digital assistants are portrayed as young, Caucasian, women that enhance the negative perception of the stereotyped role of women in secretarial roles.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 17

Authors
Spencer, J., Poggi, J., & Gheerawo, R.
Affiliations
Royal College of Art (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-11-28
Pages
130-135
OpenAlex
W2908616299
Cited by
17
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (GOODTECHS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tata Consultancy Services
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
stereotypes, artificial intelligence, emotional intelligence, virtual assistants, natural language processing, algorithmic bias, human-machine interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review