Users requirements in the design of a virtual agent for patients with dementia and their caregivers
Abstract
Over 50 million people worldwide are living with dementia and it is expected that this will double every 20 years. With our project "Living well with Anne" we aim to develop a virtual agent, called Anne which can help people with dementia to continue living independently in their own homes and support their caregivers in their caring tasks. The project started in June 2017 and will last 3 years. Using a user-centered approach, the virtual agent will be developed so that it can progressively meet the needs of the people as the level of dementia changes. The project has already undertaken some work related to the end-user needs and requirements which will be followed by extensive field trials. This paper reports on the results of the first part of our project: end-user and stakeholder requirements analysis. This requirement analysis has been obtained through focus groups which were held at end-user organizations in Italy and Luxembourg. Results show that Anne can be useful to help people with dementia to continue living independently at home given specific adjustments. It may have an impact on the Quality of Life of both the users and (by proxy) their caregivers but its relevance needs to be explored in more detail within the forthcoming field trials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
All functionalities and features of Anne were developed following a user-driven approach, with engagement of a multidisciplinary team and involvement of users in the requirements definition process.
“All these functionalities and features were developed following a user-driven approach [14], with the engagement of a multidisciplinary team and the involvement of users in the requirements definition process [15,16].”
The study adopted a user-centric design approach to adapt Anne's original version to the specificities of users.
“In this study, the connectivity between information and communication technologies sectors, clinical staff, and research fields was ensured by adopting a user-centric design approach [14], enabling Anne’s original version to be adapted to the specificities of users.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- de Jong, M., Stara, V., von Döllen, V., Bolliger, D., Heerink, M., & Evers, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Twente, The Netherlands
- Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani (IT)
- Développement organisationnel, Stëftung Hëllef Doheem, Luxembourg
- Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
- Windesheim University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- University of Twente (NL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-11-28
- Pages
- 136-141
- OpenAlex
- W2908750433
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (GOODTECHS) (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Ministero della Salute
- Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
- Active and Assisted Living programme
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- dementia, virtual agents, caregivers, user requirements, user-centered design, independent living at home, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review