Cited by 18Social Robot Interaction and HRITechnology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Users requirements in the design of a virtual agent for patients with dementia and their caregivers

de Jong, Michiel, Stara, Vera, von Döllen, Viviane, Bolliger, Daniel, Heerink, Marcel, Evers, Vanessa·2018·Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good

Abstract

Over 50 million people worldwide are living with dementia and it is expected that this will double every 20 years. With our project "Living well with Anne" we aim to develop a virtual agent, called Anne which can help people with dementia to continue living independently in their own homes and support their caregivers in their caring tasks. The project started in June 2017 and will last 3 years. Using a user-centered approach, the virtual agent will be developed so that it can progressively meet the needs of the people as the level of dementia changes. The project has already undertaken some work related to the end-user needs and requirements which will be followed by extensive field trials. This paper reports on the results of the first part of our project: end-user and stakeholder requirements analysis. This requirement analysis has been obtained through focus groups which were held at end-user organizations in Italy and Luxembourg. Results show that Anne can be useful to help people with dementia to continue living independently at home given specific adjustments. It may have an impact on the Quality of Life of both the users and (by proxy) their caregivers but its relevance needs to be explored in more detail within the forthcoming field trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3284869.3284899

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 18

Authors
de Jong, M., Stara, V., von Döllen, V., Bolliger, D., Heerink, M., & Evers, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente, The Netherlands
  • Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani (IT)
  • Développement organisationnel, Stëftung Hëllef Doheem, Luxembourg
  • Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
  • Windesheim University of Applied Sciences (NL)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good
Publisher
ACM
Published
2018-11-28
Pages
136-141
OpenAlex
W2908750433
Cited by
18
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.58
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good (GOODTECHS) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw
  • Ministero della Salute
  • Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
  • Active and Assisted Living programme
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
dementia, virtual agents, caregivers, user requirements, user-centered design, independent living at home, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review