ALOHA: an architectural-aware framework for deep learning at the edge
Open accessAbstract
Novel Deep Learning (DL) algorithms show ever-increasing accuracy and precision in multiple application domains. However, some steps further are needed towards the ubiquitous adoption of this kind of instrument. First, effort and skills required to develop new DL models, or to adapt existing ones to new use-cases, are hardly available for small- and medium-sized businesses. Second, DL inference must be brought at the edge, to overcome limitations posed by the classically-used cloud computing paradigm. This requires implementation on low-energy computing nodes, often heterogenous and parallel, that are usually more complex to program and to manage. This work describes the ALOHA framework, that proposes a solution to these issue by means of an integrated tool flow that automates most phases of the development process. The framework introduces architecture-awareness, considering the target inference platform very early, already during algorithm selection, and driving the optimal porting of the resulting embedded application. Moreover it considers security, power efficiency and adaptiveness as main objectives during the whole development process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ALOHA formulates a toolflow to automate model design, optimize model configuration, and automate model porting.
“ALOHA [182] formulates a toolflow: 1) Automate the model design.It generates the optimal model configuration by taking into account the target task, the set of constraints and the target architecture; 2) Optimize the model configuration.It partitions the DL model and accordingly generates architecture-aware mapping information between different inference tasks and the available resources.3) Autom”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [182]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Meloni, P., Loi, D., Deriu, G., Pimentel, A. D., Sapra, D., Moser, B., Shepeleva, N., Conti, F., Benini, L., Ripolles, O., Solans, D., Pintor, M., Biggio, B., Stefanov, T., Minakova, S., Fragoulis, N., Theodorakopoulos, I., Masin, M., & Palumbo, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) (AT)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- ETH Zurich, Switzerland
- CA Technologies, Spain
- Pluribus One, Italy
- Leiden University (NL)
- Irida Labs (Greece) (GR)
- IBM Research - Haifa (IL)
- University of Sassari (IT)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Workshop on INTelligent Embedded Systems Architectures and Applications
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-10-04
- Pages
- 19-26
- OpenAlex
- W2899645952
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
- UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Union (780788)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- deep learning inference, edge computing, embedded systems, automated machine learning, tool flow, model porting, power efficiency, security (computing), small and medium-sized enterprises
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review