“Applying machine learning to improve curriculum design,”
Abstract
Creating curriculum with an ever-changing student body is difficult. Faculty members in a given department will have different perspectives on the composition and academic needs of the student body based on their personal instructional experiences. We present an approach to curriculum development that is designed to be objective by performing a comprehensive analysis of the preparation of declared majors in Computer Science (CS) BS programs at two universities. Our strategy for improving curriculum is twofold. First, we analyze the characteristics and academic needs of the student body by using a statistical, machine learning approach, which involves examining institutional data and understanding what factors specifically affect graduation. Second, we use the results of the analysis as the basis for applying necessary changes to the curriculum in order to maximize graduation rates. To validate our approach, we analyzed two four-year open enrollment universities, which share many trends that help or hinder students' progress toward graduating. Finally, we describe proposed changes to both curriculum and faculty mindsets that are a result of our findings. Although the specifics of this study are applied only to CS majors, we believe that the methods outlined in this paper can be applied to any curriculum regardless of the major.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last decade, several works have used AI-informed curriculum design approaches.
“however the last decade saw several works using AI-informed curriculum design approaches.”
From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Ball et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Ball, R., Duhadway, L., Feuz, K., Jensen, J., Rague, B., & Weidman, D.
- Affiliations
- Weber State University (US)
- ORCID
- Jensen, Joshua
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-02-22
- Pages
- 787-793
- OpenAlex
- W2916219091
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- curriculum development, computer science education, graduation rates, student retention, faculty perspectives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review