Cited by 21Online Learning and AnalyticsInformation Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentEngineering Education and Curriculum Development

“Applying machine learning to improve curriculum design,”

Ball, Robert, Duhadway, Linda, Feuz, Kyle, Jensen, Joshua, Rague, Brian, Weidman, Drew·2019·Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Abstract

Creating curriculum with an ever-changing student body is difficult. Faculty members in a given department will have different perspectives on the composition and academic needs of the student body based on their personal instructional experiences. We present an approach to curriculum development that is designed to be objective by performing a comprehensive analysis of the preparation of declared majors in Computer Science (CS) BS programs at two universities. Our strategy for improving curriculum is twofold. First, we analyze the characteristics and academic needs of the student body by using a statistical, machine learning approach, which involves examining institutional data and understanding what factors specifically affect graduation. Second, we use the results of the analysis as the basis for applying necessary changes to the curriculum in order to maximize graduation rates. To validate our approach, we analyzed two four-year open enrollment universities, which share many trends that help or hinder students' progress toward graduating. Finally, we describe proposed changes to both curriculum and faculty mindsets that are a result of our findings. Although the specifics of this study are applied only to CS majors, we believe that the methods outlined in this paper can be applied to any curriculum regardless of the major.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3287324.3287430

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 21

Authors
Ball, R., Duhadway, L., Feuz, K., Jensen, J., Rague, B., & Weidman, D.
Affiliations
Weber State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-02-22
Pages
787-793
OpenAlex
W2916219091
Cited by
21
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
curriculum development, computer science education, graduation rates, student retention, faculty perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review