Cited by 191Digital Games and MediaDigital Economy and Work TransformationEmotional Labor in Professions

Volunteer Moderators in Twitch Micro Communities: How They Get Involved, the Roles They Play, and the Emotional Labor They Experience

Wohn, Donghee Yvette·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

The ability to engage in real-time text conversations is an important feature on live streaming platforms. The moderation of this text content relies heavily on the work of unpaid volunteers. This study reports on interviews with 20 people who moderate for Twitch micro communities, defined as channels that are built around a single or group of streamers, rather than the broadcast of an event. The study identifies how people become moderators, their different styles of moderating, and the difficulties that come with the job. In addition to the hardships of dealing with negative content, moderators also have complex interpersonal relationships with the streamers and viewers, where the boundaries between emotional labor, physical labor, and fun are intertwined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3290605.3300390

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, few academic studies have explored what impacts the demands of the content moderation job might engender, and many conducted have focused on the experience of volunteer content moderators.

    “To date, there have been few academic studies that explore what impacts the demands of the job might engender and many that have been conducted have focused on the experience of volunteer CMs (e.g., Dosono & Semaan, 2019; Lo, 2018; Wohn, 2019).”
  • Content moderators have to maintain high accuracy levels and throughput quotas to meet acceptable job performance standards, which contribute to stress above that from viewing the content alone.

    “In addition, CMs have to maintain high accuracy levels and throughput quotas to meet acceptable job performance standards, which contribute to stress above that which might be experienced through viewing the content alone (Dwoskin et al., 2019; Wohn, 2019).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 191

Authors
Wohn, D. Y.
Affiliations
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wohn, Donghee Yvette
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
1-13
OpenAlex
W2940648399
Cited by
191
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9
FWCI
66.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mozilla Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (1841354)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
Keywords
volunteer moderators, Twitch, live streaming, micro-communities, online community moderation, emotional labor, negative content, unpaid work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review