Cited by 125

Pythia: AI-assisted Code Completion System

Svyatkovskiy, Alexey, Zhao, Ying, Fu, Shengyu, Sundaresan, Neel·2019·Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3292500.3330699

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional code completion techniques typically involve analyzing code to identify potential suggestions, followed by re-ranking them.

    “Traditional code completion techniques typically involve analyzing code to identify potential suggestions, followed by re-ranking them”

    From RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation (2023) · cites this paper as Svyatkovskiy et al., 2019

  • The traditional re-ranking approach offers efficient performance but lacks flexibility to generate code at arbitrary granularity.

    “While this approach offers efficient performance, it lacks the flexibility to generate code at arbitrary granularity.”

    From RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation (2023) · cites this paper as Svyatkovskiy et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. G. C. Murphy, M. Kersten, and L. Findlater. How are java software developers using the eclipse ide? IEEE, 23(4):76-83, 2006.
  2. Sebastian Proksch, Johannes Lerch, and Mira Mezini. Intelligent code completion with bayesian networks. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 25(1):3, 2015.
  3. D'Souza Andrea Renika, Di Yang, and Cristina V Lopes. Collective intelligence for smarter api recommendations in python. In Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), 2016 IEEE 16th International Working Conference on, pages 51-60. IEEE, 2016.
  4. Veselin Raychev, Martin Vechev, and Eran Yahav. Code completion with statistical language models. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, volume 49, pages 419-428. ACM, 2014.
  5. Marcel Bruch, Martin Monperrus, and Mira Mezini. Learning from examples to improve code completion systems. In Proceedings of the the 7th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on The foundations of software engineering, pages 213-222. ACM, 2009.
  6. A. Alnusair, T. Zhao, and E. Bodden. Effective api navigation and reuse. IRI, pages 7-12, 2010.
  7. T. Gvero, V. Kuncak, I. Kuraj, and R. Piskac. Complete completion using types and weights. In PLDI'13. ACM, 2013.
  8. A. Zimdars, D. M. Chickering, and C. Meek. Using temporal data for making recommendations. In Proceedings of 7th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 580-588. UAI, 2001.
  9. B. Mobasher, H. Dai, T. Luo, and M. Nakagawa. Using sequential and non-sequential patterns in predictive web usage mining tasks. In International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 2002.
  10. R. I. Brafman G. Shani and D. Heckerman. An mdp-based recommender system. In Proceedings of 8th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. UAI, 2002.
  11. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, pages 3111-3119.
  12. Junhua Mao, Wei Xu, Yi Yang, Jiang Wang, Zhiheng Huang, and Alan Yuille. Deep captioning with multimodal recurrent neural networks (m-rnn). ICLR, 2015.
  13. Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher Potts. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1631-1642, Stroudsburg, PA, October 2013. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  14. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes, N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pages 3104-3112.
  15. Hakan Inan, Khashayar Khosravi, and Richard Socher. Tying word vectors and word classifiers: A loss framework for language modeling. CoRR, abs/1611.01462, 2016. · arXiv
  16. Alex Graves. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. CoRR, abs/1308.0850, 2013. · arXiv
  17. Priya Goyal, Piotr Dollár, Ross B. Girshick, Pieter Noordhuis, Lukasz Wesolowski, Aapo Kyrola, Andrew Tulloch, Yangqing Jia, and Kaiming He. Accurate, large minibatch SGD: training imagenet in 1 hour. CoRR, abs/1706.02677, 2017. · arXiv
  18. Colin Raffel and Daniel P. W. Ellis. Feed-forward networks with attention can solve some long-term memory problems. CoRR, abs/1512.08756, 2015. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Svyatkovskiy, A., Zhao, Y., Fu, S., & Sundaresan, N.
Affiliations
Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-07-25
Pages
2727-2735
Cited by
125
References
0
Funders
Microsoft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review