Cited by 265Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionGender, Feminism, and MediaGender and Feminist Studies

Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit

Farrell, Tracie, Fernandez, Miriam, Novotny, Jakub, Alani, Harith·2019·Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science

Abstract

The 'manosphere' has been a recent subject of feminist scholarship on the web. Serious accusations have been levied against it for its role in encouraging misogyny and violent threats towards women online, as well as for potentially radicalising lonely or disenfranchised men. Feminist scholars evidence this through a shift in the language and interests of some men's rights activists on the manosphere, away from traditional subjects of family law or mental health and towards more sexually explicit, violent, racist and homophobic language. In this paper, we study this phenomenon by investigating the flow of extreme language across seven online communities on Reddit, with openly misogynistic members (e.g., Men Going Their Own Way, Involuntarily Celibates), and investigate if and how misogynistic ideas spread within and across these communities. Grounded on feminist critiques of language, we created nine lexicons capturing specific misogynistic rhetoric (Physical Violence, Sexual Violence, Hostility, Patriarchy, Stoicism, Racism, Homophobia, Belittling, and Flipped Narrative) and used these lexicons to explore how language evolves within and across misogynistic groups. This analysis was conducted on 6 million posts, from 300K conversations created between 2011 and December 2018. Our results shows increasing patterns on misogynistic content and users as well as violent attitudes, corroborating existing theories of feminist studies that the amount of misogyny, hostility and violence is steadily increasing in the manosphere.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3292522.3326045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misogynist groups spread homophobic, racist, and violent language.

    “This includes misogynist groups, which often employ the Internet to reassert male dominance despite their lack of social and economic capital in everyday lives (Debbie Ging and Eugenia Siapera 2018), and who spread homophobic, racist, and violent language (Farrell et al. 2019).”
  • The study takes as its premises some results obtained by research conducted using Big Data techniques, notably how posts are perpetuated, the porosity of the different echo chambers that make up the Manosphere, and the gradual transition of the members of the oldest communities (MRA and PUA) to the most radical ones (MGTOW and Incels).

    “The study also takes as its premises some of the results obtained by research conducted using Big Data techniques, notably how posts are perpetuated, the porosity of the different echo chambers that make up the Manosphere, and the gradual transition of the members of the oldest communities ( MRA and PUA ), which come from the real world, to the most radical ones ( MGTOW and Incels ), generated in”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 265

Authors
Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
  • No affiliation, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-06-26
Pages
87-96
OpenAlex
W2952937483
Cited by
265
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
EU H2020 TRIVALENT (740934)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
manosphere, misogyny, men's rights activism, online communities, Reddit, radicalization, racism, homophobia, patriarchy, Stoicism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review