Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit
Abstract
The 'manosphere' has been a recent subject of feminist scholarship on the web. Serious accusations have been levied against it for its role in encouraging misogyny and violent threats towards women online, as well as for potentially radicalising lonely or disenfranchised men. Feminist scholars evidence this through a shift in the language and interests of some men's rights activists on the manosphere, away from traditional subjects of family law or mental health and towards more sexually explicit, violent, racist and homophobic language. In this paper, we study this phenomenon by investigating the flow of extreme language across seven online communities on Reddit, with openly misogynistic members (e.g., Men Going Their Own Way, Involuntarily Celibates), and investigate if and how misogynistic ideas spread within and across these communities. Grounded on feminist critiques of language, we created nine lexicons capturing specific misogynistic rhetoric (Physical Violence, Sexual Violence, Hostility, Patriarchy, Stoicism, Racism, Homophobia, Belittling, and Flipped Narrative) and used these lexicons to explore how language evolves within and across misogynistic groups. This analysis was conducted on 6 million posts, from 300K conversations created between 2011 and December 2018. Our results shows increasing patterns on misogynistic content and users as well as violent attitudes, corroborating existing theories of feminist studies that the amount of misogyny, hostility and violence is steadily increasing in the manosphere.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misogynist groups spread homophobic, racist, and violent language.
“This includes misogynist groups, which often employ the Internet to reassert male dominance despite their lack of social and economic capital in everyday lives (Debbie Ging and Eugenia Siapera 2018), and who spread homophobic, racist, and violent language (Farrell et al. 2019).”
From “Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere (2023) · cites this paper as Farrell et al. 2019
The study takes as its premises some results obtained by research conducted using Big Data techniques, notably how posts are perpetuated, the porosity of the different echo chambers that make up the Manosphere, and the gradual transition of the members of the oldest communities (MRA and PUA) to the most radical ones (MGTOW and Incels).
“The study also takes as its premises some of the results obtained by research conducted using Big Data techniques, notably how posts are perpetuated, the porosity of the different echo chambers that make up the Manosphere, and the gradual transition of the members of the oldest communities ( MRA and PUA ), which come from the real world, to the most radical ones ( MGTOW and Incels ), generated in”
From Misogyny and the construction of toxic masculinity in the Spanish Manosphere (Burbuja.info) (2023) · cites this paper as Farrell et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 265
- Authors
- Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
- No affiliation, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
- ORCID
- Alani, Harith
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2019-06-26
- Pages
- 87-96
- OpenAlex
- W2952937483
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- EU H2020 TRIVALENT (740934)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- manosphere, misogyny, men's rights activism, online communities, Reddit, radicalization, racism, homophobia, patriarchy, Stoicism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review