A Survey of Zero-Shot Learning: Settings, Methods, and Applications
Abstract
Most machine-learning methods focus on classifying instances whose classes have already been seen in training. In practice, many applications require classifying instances whose classes have not been seen previously. Zero-shot learning is a powerful and promising learning paradigm, in which the classes covered by training instances and the classes we aim to classify are disjoint. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of zero-shot learning. First of all, we provide an overview of zero-shot learning. According to the data utilized in model optimization, we classify zero-shot learning into three learning settings. Second, we describe different semantic spaces adopted in existing zero-shot learning works. Third, we categorize existing zero-shot learning methods and introduce representative methods under each category. Fourth, we discuss different applications of zero-shot learning. Finally, we highlight promising future research directions of zero-shot learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These issues are related to machine learning topics including few-shot learning, zero-shot learning, meta-learning, unsupervised learning, semi-supervised learning, transfer learning, and domain adaptation.
“These issues are related to some well-known machine learning research topics including fewshot learning [31], zero-shot learning [32], meta-learning [33], unsupervised learning [34], semi-supervised learning [35], transfer learning [36], and domain adaptation [37], [38].”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
ZSL can be formulated as learning a mapping from the data space to the semantic space [32].
“Therefore, ZSL can be formulated as learning a mapping from the data space to the semantic space [32].”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 195 · Cited by 528
- Authors
- Wang, W., Zheng, V. W., Yu, H., & Miao, C.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- WeBank, Shahexilu, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
- Published
- 2019-01-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 2157-6904 (ISSN-L)
- 2157-6912
- OpenAlex
- W2910453440
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 195
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 96 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 14 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NTU-PKU Joint Research Institute
- IDM Futures Funding Initiative
- Interdisciplinary Graduate School
- Nanyang Assistant Professorship
- Nanyang Technological University and Peking University
- National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore
- Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Ng Teng Fong Charitable Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- zero-shot learning, unseen classes, semantic space, learning environment, classification, image classification, text classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review